My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-11-2013 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2013
>
03-11-2013 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 10:25:03 AM
Creation date
4/7/2015 12:48:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
420
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 25, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 19 of 21 <br /> <br />(15. CITY CLERK APPOINTMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHART, Continued) <br /> <br />Levang stated she would like to compliment the City Administrator on the list that was compiled and how <br />staff has re-evaluated the responsibilities. Levang asked if staff sees any change in hours or will that all <br />stay the same. <br /> <br />Loftus indicated that was broken out because the items above it relate directly to the city clerk and the <br />deputy city clerk and that the other duties relate to the up-front staff. <br /> <br />Anderson stated she would like a follow-up report at the end of 2013 to evaluate whether this was a <br />correct decision. Given the fact that 2014 is an election year, this is not something to take lightly and that <br />they do not want to make a mistake and should follow the rules accordingly. <br /> <br />Printup stated one of his goals or thoughts was to contract city hall in size and that he is leaning towards <br />Option 1 where it is more like a city administrator/clerk or treasurer/clerk. Being that it sounds like the <br />consensus of the City Council is to go with Option 2 and also knowing that there are training <br />opportunities involved to allow this to work, he will be inclined to go with Option 2. <br /> <br />Bremer stated she would prefer Option 1 and not be in this situation. Bremer stated she thought the <br />Council was on the right track with posting the position but that she is willing to try it this way. <br /> <br />Levang moved, Printup seconded, to accept Option 2, changing the deputy clerk title to city clerk <br />and allowing Rachel Dodge to take over the essential duties, with the City Administrator returning <br />with wage and other additional information at the next council meeting. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, <br />Bremer opposed. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the next item to discuss is the changing of Mr. Gaffron’s title. <br /> <br />Bremer stated organizationally the change in title makes sense and it is something the Council has talked <br />about in the past. <br /> <br />Printup indicated he is in agreement with the change and that the only comment he would make is where <br />it talks about doing high-level planning work. Printup suggested it also say something about dealing with <br />overflow land use applications or assisting if the Planning Department is getting behind to allow some <br />more flexibility. Printup noted not too many years ago that department was called community <br />development and questioned whether the City wants to go back to that name. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated he does not recall Orono actually having the title of community development director. The <br />department over the years has had a number of different names and that he does not have a problem with <br />the structure as proposed. Gaffron stated in his view planning and building director is a fine title. <br /> <br />McMillan indicated she would like to spend more time discussing the planning department and where the <br />department should go. McMillan stated she is hesitant to making any formal motion tonight before <br />discussing this further. The next work session will not be until April 25 but the Council could hold a <br />special work session if they thought it was necessary. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 03/11/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 02/25/2013 [Page 19 of 21]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.