My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-27-2014 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
10-27-2014 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 10:44:12 AM
Creation date
4/7/2015 11:54:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 13, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 16 of 21 <br />(9. WATERTOWN ROAD AND MSA FUNDING PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION, Continued) <br /> <br />McMillan noted the price of oil is coming down, which should be advantageous to the City. McMillan <br />stated she is not sure whether the City can afford to do the entire project. McMillan noted Stubbs Bay is <br />not an MSA road and that the funds would need to come out of another fund if the City decides to <br />proceed forward with that project. <br /> <br />Olson stated the only funds that would have a balance in them are the PIR fund, which has not historically <br />been used for road projects, and the Community Investment Fund, but that those funds will be reduced by <br />the Navarre lighting project. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the City’s general fund is at 50 percent. <br /> <br />Olson stated it is typically around 50 percent. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the City currently has $1.2 million in MSA funds and that it will take three to four years <br />to get it back up to that amount. <br /> <br />Olson stated the majority of the MSA money is going to pay the debt service on the bonds and that it will <br />grow slowly by approximately 20 to 25 thousand per year. Olson stated $867,000 is still in the state fund. <br /> <br />Levang asked if the Mayor is thinking the City should not do Section 2. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she is questioning how it will be paid for. <br /> <br />Printup indicated he is okay with Section 2 if the costs can be reduced somehow and that the residents <br />have been looking to have the roads redone for the past couple of years. <br />McMillan asked if he is suggesting the City go ahead with Stubbs Bay Road now. <br /> <br />Printup stated in his view the project can be done in phases. <br /> <br />Edwards stated Staff’s recommendation was to do Section 1 in 2015 and then Section 2 the following <br />year. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the question that will need to be addressed is how to pay for the project. <br /> <br />Levang asked how far the Pavement Management Fund can be drained down to. <br /> <br />Olson stated the Pavement Management Fund is basically at zero currently and would require a transfer <br />from another fund. <br /> <br />McMillan asked what the City’s policy is for using city funds on an MSA road. McMillan stated the City <br />could bond for the improvements but that, in her view, is a bigger issue. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if 2016 is a realistic date for Long Lake to do their portion of the road. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 10/27/2014 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 10/27/14 <br />[Page 16 of 21]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.