Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />Monday, June 23, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  Page 12 of 30  <br /> <br />(7. 13-3638 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL – 405 NORTH ARM DRIVE, LAKEVIEW PROPERTY, <br />APPROVE EAW FOR PUBLICATION AND PUBLIC COMMENT – RESOLUTION NO. 6417, <br />Continued) <br /> <br />Gaffron noted additional reference materials that were not included in the Council’s packet consisted of a <br />link to approximately 200 pages concerning different soil borings and other testing that was conducted on <br />the site. Included in the Council’s packet were the results of Hennepin County’s traffic assessment of the <br />County Road 19 and North Arm Drive intersection. The City had requested Hennepin County provide <br />some information and an analysis of the safety of the intersection, traffic speeds, and sight distance. <br />Hennepin County’s conclusion regarding the speed of the vehicles is that the majority of the vehicles are <br />traveling close or at the posted speed limit and that sufficient stopping sight distance is provided for <br />vehicles on County Road 19 approaching North Arm Drive. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted the information from Hennepin County has not been included in the EAW and that it is up <br />to the City Council whether it should be included. <br /> <br />Steve Grittman, Consulting Planner, stated the material in the Council’s packet reflects a stage of the <br />environmental review process, which is a process that is initiated in a number of ways. In this particular <br />case, it is related to the golf course conversion to a residential subdivision. The purpose of the EAW is to <br />measure and identify potential environmental impacts and any potential mitigation that might be done for <br />those impacts that are identified. Eventually the City Council makes a decision at the end of the EAW <br />process as to whether or not there is need for an environmental impact statement, which is a more <br />elaborate review of environmental impacts. <br /> <br />Grittman stated this is the beginning of the EAW process and that the Council is considering tonight <br />whether the submitted draft EAW should be published by the Environmental Quality Board. Grittman <br />noted the City Council is not approving the EAW. Grittman indicated there are a series of publication <br />notification requirements that occur if the Council approves publication tonight, which also initiates <br />commencement of the comment period. If the Council approves publication, it is anticipated it will be <br />published by the EQB in their July 7 newsletter. Following publication, there is a 30-day review period. <br />Grittman noted the City is also required to provide this particular information to a number of state <br />agencies as well as anyone who requests in writing to be included on the comment list, such as <br />neighboring property owners or other government agencies. <br /> <br />Grittman noted the City Council is not required to hold a public meeting during this period but may do so <br />if they so desire. Following publication and the comment period, the City Council will have the <br />opportunity to consider all comments properly submitted and, if appropriate, request additional study <br />based on those comments. <br /> <br />Grittman noted at the end of the comment period, the City Council’s action will be to make a negative <br />declaration or a positive declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement. Given the time <br />frame for publication and comment, that decision is likely to come before the City Council in August or <br />September. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 07/14/2014 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 06/23/2014 <br />[Page 12 of 30]