My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-2014 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
04-28-2014 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 10:34:15 AM
Creation date
4/6/2015 3:14:35 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
409
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 14, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 10 of 30 <br />(10. #14-3658 SUNCREST BUILDERS – WAUSAU HOMES ON BEHALF OF JOHN AND <br /> ALICE REINMANN, 440 BIG ISLAND – VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE <br /> PERMIT – RESOLUTION NO. 6383, Continued) <br /> <br />Curtis stated Staff’s initial recommendation regarding the plumbing within the guest cabin was for <br />removal. Since the Planning Commission meeting, Staff has done additional research into the little-used <br />provision of the RS-District Zoning Code and has determined the 700 square foot accessory guest cabin <br />must be served with plumbing. <br /> <br />Curtis noted since the Planning Commission’s review, the applicant has revised the plan so as to not <br />encroach into the average lakeshore setback and they will be removing the loft area from the cabin. <br /> <br />Curtis noted due to the winter conditions, the applicant has been unable to provide a conforming septic <br />system design to serve the four bedroom cabin, which includes the basement and the existing two <br />bedroom cabin. Curtis indicated it is her understanding the applicant will be meeting the septic designer <br />this week. If it is determined that the site cannot support the necessary 6-bedroom septic treatment area <br />as well as the required alternate site, the applicant will need to make additional bedroom reductions in the <br />proposed cabin, remove all plumbing from the existing 700 square foot cabin, or a combination of both. <br />If the plumbing is removed from the 700 square foot cabin, it will no longer be considered a guest cabin <br />or bunk house and must only be used as a non-habitable building. <br /> <br />Curtis noted the Planning Commission reviewed this application at their March meeting and voted 6 to 0 <br />to recommend approval of the guest cabin conditional use permit and lot area variance. There were no <br />public comments regarding this application. <br /> <br />Curtis stated that Staff recommends approval and has drafted a resolution reflecting approval of the lot <br />area variance permitting construction of the new seasonal cabin and approval of the conditional use <br />permit to allow maintenance of the 700 square foot guest cabin subject to strict adherence to all applicable <br />environmental codes and all building and zoning codes. <br /> <br />Curtis noted once septic testing is completed, if a 6-bedroom sized treatment area is not feasible, the <br />application may change. If the solution involves a combination of reducing bedrooms in the main cabin <br />and/or the existing 700 square foot cabin, the lot area variance and conditional use permits will be <br />necessary. However, if the solution the applicant chooses is to remove the plumbing from the existing <br />cabin and convert it to non-habitable storage, the conditional use permit and variance for lot area are no <br />longer necessary. <br /> <br />Curtis noted the Council should consider amending or adopting the resolution which is conditioned on <br />confirmation that a viable 6-bedroom septic treatment area and alternate site are feasible. If the approvals <br />are no longer necessary, the resolution will not be recorded. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she does not have a problem with the application. <br /> <br />Levang asked what the difference is in the location of the new cabin so that it is now out of the average <br />lakeshore setback. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated they rotated it slightly and moved it a little further back. Curtis illustrated the portion of <br />the cabin that encroached into the average lakeshore setback and the new proposed location. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 04/28/2014 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 04/14/2014 <br />[Page 10 of 30]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.