Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 18, 2013 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 6 of 35  <br />  <br />The Conservation Design Master Plan contains a recommendation for invasive species removal and <br />management. Common buckthorn is to be removed from the west and east tree stands. The reed canary <br />grass is allowed to remain in the wetland areas. In addition, diseased trees will be cut down and removed <br />from the site. Replacement trees are to be replanted. The northeast tree stand will be protected and any <br />lost trees are to be replanted with Big Woods types. The ecological connections will be maintained via <br />preservation of wetlands and the northeast tree stand. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted the proposed lot layout does not appear to conflict with the Conservation Design Master <br />Plan since the protected areas are not proposed to be developed. <br /> <br />The wetlands would likely require a 16-foot buffer per the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The <br />final wetland management class needs to be conformed to meet the Watershed District’s requirements <br />prior to final plat approval. The plat layout indicates a 35-foot wetland setback for structures, which <br />meets the Orono wetland setback requirements. As recommended by the City Engineer, drainage and <br />utility easements must be shown on the final plat and final street, utility and grading plans. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated the developer is providing stormwater management facilities on the site consisting of a <br />number of rain garden basins rather than a single stormwater pond. It is likely the Watershed District will <br />approve this and a final stormwater management plan will have to be submitted with the final <br />construction plans. <br /> <br />There is an existing drainage easement within the easterly portion of the property approximately <br />following the creek bed. This easement does not exactly match the current flow line of the creek. This <br />easement is proposed to be vacated and a corrected easement dedicated to replace it. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated the developer is providing stormwater management facilities on the site consisting of a <br />number of rain garden basins rather than a single stormwater pond. It is likely the Watershed District will <br />approve this and a final stormwater management plan will have to be submitted with the final <br />construction plans. <br /> <br />Minimum pertinent lot standards for the RPUD District are as follows: <br /> <br />1. A minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet. <br /> <br />2. Minimum lot width of 90 feet. <br /> <br />3. Minimum lot depth of 125 feet. <br /> <br />4. Front yard setbacks of 25 feet; side local street setback of 25 feet; side collector street of 50 feet; <br /> side interior to RPUD of ten feet; side abutting non-RPUD land of 15 feet; and a rear setback of <br /> 40 feet or 20 percent of lot depth. In addition, there is a 35 foot setback from the wetland. <br /> <br />Lot 1, Block 1 will have 0.32 acres of dry buildable land for the building site, which is slightly under the <br />RPUD standard. This lot will be a corner lot, with the front lot line being the frontage along the new <br />road. Proposed lot width is 91 feet, meeting the RPUD standard. The proposed buildable envelope is <br />shown meeting RPUD setbacks front, interior side and wetland. However, since Willow Drive is defined <br />as a collector road, the side street setback to Willow should be 50 feet rather than 25 feet as shown on the <br />plan. <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 01/21/14* <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 11/18/2013 <br />[Page 6 of 35]