My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-16-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2014
>
06-16-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 11:40:46 AM
Creation date
4/6/2015 2:08:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 19, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 27 of 31 <br /> <br />Gaffron stated it appears to go to the center of the creek. <br /> <br />Teele indicated her survey looks like the applicant’s. <br /> <br />Maddrey stated this is the first time she has heard of this. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated there is nothing in the legal description that is shown on the survey that matches the <br />original plat lines. <br /> <br />Teele asked why the 1912 survey is correct and not the more recent one. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated there have not been any changes to the plat other than the lots were split off, which was <br />done without including any property past the 102 feet. Gaffron stated there is no evidence in the record <br />that shows those properties extend past the creek. <br /> <br />Thiesse noted the stakes were placed by the surveyor according to the survey. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the aerial photo does not appear to directly match up but it represents the dimensions of each <br />of the properties. <br /> <br />Teele asked why so many surveys are incorrect. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the City is only aware of two incorrect surveys, which were done more recently. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated all the other surveys show the depth of the lots as 102 feet and not 132 feet. <br /> <br />Teele asked how much higher the new structure would be versus the existing structure. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated it would be 26 feet to the peak and would be perhaps 50 percent higher than the current <br />structure. <br /> <br />Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 9:35 p.m. <br /> <br />Leskinen stated it is pretty clear that there is a practical difficulty and that constructing a second story is a <br />reasonable request. Leskinen stated if the foundation becomes an issue, that will be something the <br />applicants will need to deal with. <br /> <br />Landgraver moved, Schoenzeit seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 14-3667, <br />Tammara Maddrey and Steven Sabes, 3435 Eastlake Street, granting of rear/street, lake, and side <br />yard setback variances. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br /> <br />6. 14-3668 CHARLES CUDD DENOVO ON BEHALF OF THE MARY J. BOWMAN <br />TRUST, 1165 FERNDALE ROAD WEST, RENEWAL OF VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL <br />USE PERMIT, 9:36 P.M. – 9:39 P.M. <br /> <br />Mary Bowman Rae, the Owner, was present. <br /> <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 06/16/2014 <br />Aproval of Planning Commission Minutes 05/19/2014 <br />[Page 27 of 31]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.