Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 19, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 3 of 31  <br />  <br />proposed residence will not be out of character with other homes in the neighborhood. Gaffron noted the <br />proposed garage will be approximately one foot higher to alleviate the drainage concerns. <br /> <br />Staff also recommends approval of a conditional use permit and variance for grading/excavation/fill <br />within the 0-75 foot zone subject to a final grading and drainage plan that addresses any concerns of the <br />City Engineer regarding slope stability and retaining wall design; subject to adherence to the City’s <br />erosion control regulations as well as the permitting requirements of the MCWD. Timely re-vegetation <br />and stabilization will be a requirement of the permitting process. <br /> <br />The applicants will also be required to take all necessary precautions to ensure that the mature oak and <br />ash trees within the 0-75 foot setback zone are not affected by construction. In addition, the applicants <br />should be aware of street and shared driveway parking and access limitations during the construction <br />process. Gaffron stated approval should be subject to all recommendations of the Consulting City <br />Engineer. <br /> <br />Leskinen asked if the shed is included in the hardcover and structural calculations. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated to his knowledge it is. <br /> <br />Leskinen asked if the removal of the underground garage will result in an open parking area to the depth <br />of what the current garage is. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated to his understanding the applicants will be removing approximately half of the <br />underground garage area, which extends close to 20 feet, and put a retaining wall with fill in that area. <br /> <br />McGrann asked if that will result in a reduction in hardcover. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated there is always a question of whether the portion of the garage located underground should <br />be considered hardcover. The proposed driveway consists of 32 square feet and the parking area is 279 <br />square feet, which equates to approximately 15’ x 20’. Gaffron stated in the proposed hardcover <br />calculations, the applicants are excluding the portion of the garage that will be filled in. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked if the intent is to remove the whole front garage and build new retaining walls. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated it appears the side walls are intended to remain and the proposed wall is depicted by the <br />dashed lines on the overhead. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated the applicant should take into consideration that when the top deck of the garage is <br />removed, a retaining wall will likely be needed. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated once you change the nature of that area, there will be approximately a 10-foot drop and <br />will likely require some type of railing for safety reasons. <br /> <br />Leskinen asked if the ability to rebuild in-kind includes accessory structures. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated it does. <br /> <br />Lemke asked if the underground garage is included in the hardcover calculations. <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 06/16/2014 <br />Aproval of Planning Commission Minutes 05/19/2014 <br />[Page 3 of 31]