My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-16-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2014
>
06-16-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 11:40:46 AM
Creation date
4/6/2015 2:08:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 19, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 31 <br /> <br />The majority of the subject property is unbuildable since all but the rear 26-40 feet is located within 75 <br />feet of the OHWL. This creates a practical difficulty for redevelopment of this property. Gaffron noted <br />that a number of the lots in this area are actually smaller than this lot. However, the applicants do have <br />the right to replace the existing residence in-kind if they choose to do so. From a footprint perspective, <br />the existing house and proposed house are nearly identical at around 1,400 square feet. The proposed <br />house will be two full stories rather than the existing 1-1/2 story structure. While the applicants’ proposal <br />will not increase hardcover, it will increase the visual bulk and massing as compared to the existing home. <br />The proposed low-pitch roof will help to keep the new house from visually towering over the neighbor to <br />the west. <br /> <br />In terms of the conditional use permit analysis for the grading, Staff looked at 15 elements. The proposed <br />retaining walls and grading improvements are residential in nature and are compliant with the zoning <br />code. The criteria in 6, 7, and 8 asks whether the proposed improvements are appropriate and in character <br />with the surrounding neighborhood. Staff believes the proposed new residence located partially within <br />the 75-foot setback area will have little impact on the surrounding lands. Drainage patterns for runoff <br />leaving the site will be altered with the intent to significantly improve them. <br /> <br />Gaffron displayed an overhead showing the drainage around the back of the house. The applicants have <br />noted that the driveway as you head west along the trail is heading downwards and experiences runoff <br />from the trail as well as the shared driveway system. Part of the proposed new home construction <br />includes raising the elevation of the garage approximately one foot to alleviate the drainage issue. The <br />drainage will be diverted down the west lot line so no drainage will be added to the house to the west. <br /> <br />Item No. 12 of the conditional use permit criteria requires that the grading activity and its results will not <br />cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets or parking needs that cause a demonstrable <br />inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access. While the proposed grading is <br />not excessive and will not be time-consuming, a neighboring property owner has indicated that access of <br />construction equipment and vehicles from the rear easement driveway area has the potential to disrupt the <br />condition and functionality of that driveway for other users. The applicants and their contractors will <br />need to be vigilant in ensuring construction activity does not impair other driveway and Crystal Bay Road <br />users and that any damage is repaired. <br /> <br />Item No. 13 requires that the grading be designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic <br />features of the area and to minimize environmental impact. The proposed grading on this lot is minimal <br />and will have few, if any, environmental impacts. <br /> <br />The applicants have indicated they plan to relocate a small 5’ x 9’ shed onto the property that is partially <br />on the HCRRA right-of-way. Gaffron suggested the Planning Commission have the applicants discuss <br />the use of that shed. There has also been some discussion as to whether the existing decorative and <br />functional retaining walls adjacent to Crystal Bay Road should be removed. Staff’s conclusion is that <br />these walls likely provide some measure of stability to the slope and their removal might cause erosion <br />problems. <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of the proposed area, width, setback and hardcover variances for construction <br />of a new home on the site on the basis that hardcover will be made conforming and the encroachment of <br />the HCRRA right-of-way will be eliminated and the easterly substandard setback will be made <br />conforming. The setback from the lake and from the street will be reduced in order for this to occur. The <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 06/16/2014 <br />Aproval of Planning Commission Minutes 05/19/2014 <br />[Page 2 of 31]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.