Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, September 15, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 10 of 59  <br />  <br />classified as an RPUD. Due to that change, instead of a conditional use permit being required, the request <br />would require a MAP amendment and that his report incorrectly calls it a PRD. <br /> <br />Mack stated the proposal involves a 4.6 acre vacant parcel of land which fronts on Kelly Avenue. The <br />applicant is proposing to develop the property for five twin homes, which would include ten single-family <br />attached dwelling units on an individual tax parcel. <br /> <br />Mack indicated the diagram in the lower right-hand corner shows a bird’s eye view of the site. The <br />development would include a private street coming in off of Kelly Avenue just south of the Lund’s <br />building and would be basically opposite from some single-family townhomes. The driveway would <br />come up the hillside with five pad sites established on the top of the hillside with a hammerhead <br />turnaround up at the very southeast end of the improvements proposed for the site. <br /> <br />In addition, the site includes a slab on grade level elevation for two units. The units would be a single <br />story with a pitched roof design with a full basement. To the rear of the units, there would be walkouts, <br />which will create essentially a two-story appearance facing Kelly Avenue. Mack stated the 4.6 acres goes <br />up to the property on Shadywood Road and fronts along Kelly Avenue. The property is currently <br />undeveloped. Within this area there is approximately a half-acre wetland that has been delineated along <br />the street. A portion of the remainder of the site is encumbered by a flowage and conservation easement. <br /> <br />Mack noted the diagram on the overhead is from a 1981 subdivision that divided the property on <br />Shadywood and this parcel. The front parcel remained commercially zoned and the other site was zoned <br />LR-1B. <br /> <br />Mack indicated the wetland is located in the southeast portion of the parcel. Approximately half of the <br />site consists of a flowage and conservation easement and was a requirement as part of the plat approval in <br />1981. Mack indicated a restriction was placed on the site to basically encompass a larger area than just <br />the wetland since there was not a clear understanding back in 1981 on how to clearly define wetlands. <br />The easterly 60 feet along the property line was not included in the easement and was reserved for a <br />private driveway into the site. Mack noted that area is lower in elevation than the location where the <br />applicant has proposed the driveway in the northwest portion of the site. <br /> <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 10/20/2014 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 09/15/2014 <br />[Page 10 of 59]