My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-20-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
10-20-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 12:25:24 PM
Creation date
4/6/2015 1:35:14 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
470
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, September 15, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 7 of 59 <br /> <br />Landgraver asked what the City Engineer’s comments are regarding the work. <br /> <br />Curtis stated Staff currently has a previous survey and an existing conditions survey, which is mid <br />project. The City Engineer had questions on the existing topography plan and Staff would like to see <br />some tweaks to the plan to make it acceptable. <br /> <br />Landgraver asked if the applicant is in agreement with all of Staff’s recommendations. <br /> <br />Kelly indicated he has not seen the tweaks but that he is sure they can meet those. <br /> <br />Leskinen noted the work is half done and that she is troubled by the fact that the work continued even <br />after a stop work order had been issued. <br /> <br />Kelly stated that work was not something they approved and was one of the reasons he was fired. <br /> <br />Leskinen stated she would be in agreement with including all of the City Engineer’s comments in the <br />motion. <br /> <br />Leskinen noted the applicants will be replacing some of the trees, and asked whether the Planning <br />Commission can make any recommendations regarding the damage to the neighbor’s tree. <br /> <br />Curtis stated it would be a property owner issue, but that if the Planning Commission has additional <br />recommendations for what happens along the lot lines, they can make those recommendations. <br /> <br />Leskinen stated replacing the trees that were taken down should be done. <br /> <br />Kelly stated the trees were not taken down but are dead. Kelly indicated they did not want the wall cut <br />that close in and that the contractor disturbed the trees and they died. <br /> <br />Curtis stated Staff is proposing the number of replacement trees based on the stumps shown in the survey. <br /> <br />Berg asked if Staff’s recommendation is to replant the two trees that are dead. <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 10/20/2014 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 09/15/2014 <br />[Page 7 of 59]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.