Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 20, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 5 of 28  <br />  <br />devoted to streets and increase the amount of land devoted to conservation. Flexibility from the <br />maximum cul-de-sac length standard can be provided through the PRD. <br /> <br />In addition, the applicants have indicated that some of the internal street curves do not meet the City’s 30 <br />mile per hour design standard. The City Engineer will need to provide comment on this matter as well as <br />other street-related issues. <br /> <br />Grittman noted the applicants have conducted a traffic study of the proposed project, which has been <br />reviewed by the City Engineer. In general the traffic study has found that the area roadways and <br />intersections have more than sufficient capacity to handle the demand created by the development and <br />that no changes to existing roadway design are necessary to accommodate the plat. The only exception to <br />this is the turn lane on westbound West Branch at the development entry point to Lake View Parkway. <br /> <br />A number of the residents had raised concerns over the design and conditions at the intersection of North <br />Arm and County Road 19, but the study conducted by Hennepin County found that the intersection meets <br />the minimum visibility requirements and the project will not impact those conditions. <br /> <br />Staff does recommend one possible change to the street pattern. The southern portion of Lake View <br />Parkway is intended to be aligned with Forest Arms Road to the south. However, due to the entrance <br />monument island proposed for Lake View, there appears to be a misalignment as it is shown on the plat. <br />Staff believes that the southbound exit lane of Lake View should be aligned to ensure that concurrent left <br />turning traffic from both Lake View and Forest Arms Road onto West Branch will not create turning <br />conflicts. <br /> <br />All proposed lots demonstrate an ability to meet required principal building setbacks. The black boxes on <br />the plat illustrate the likely or potential building sites but are not the final design for any lot. Each lot is <br />likely to be custom graded with house design, grading, and driveway access designed for the purchaser. <br />The proposed plat shows potential building sites that would meet the code requirements for setback and <br />reasonable driveway access, along with septic and well sites to serve the lot. As a result, no variances <br />should be needed to accommodate future home construction. <br /> <br />A total f nine outlots are proposed within the subdivision. With the exception of Outlot C and Outlot I, <br />the proposed outlots will be owned and maintained by the homeowners association. Outlot C is proposed <br />to be replatted as an individual residential parcel for sale and development at some point in the future. <br />Outlot I will potentially become a privately owned public park. If the park concept does not work out, the <br />outlot may be replatted as a residential parcel. <br /> <br />Two trail connections are proposed between North Arm Drive and Lake View Parkway. Grittman stated <br />it is presumed that these trails will be private in nature but should be confirmed by the applicants and be <br />specifically addressed within the subdivision development agreement. No trails and/or sidewalks have <br />been proposed along the periphery of the site. <br /> <br />Approximately one-third of the septic sites are wholly or partially within the conservation easement. The <br />acceptability of the containment of septic sites within conservation easements should be determined as <br />part of plat approval. The homeowners association will be responsible for monitoring the use and <br />maintenance of the conservation easement areas. The City Engineer has provided a number of comments <br />relating to the septic sites and will need to be integrated into the Planning Commission’s review and <br />recommendations. <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 11/17/2014 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 10/20/2014 <br />[Page 5 of 28]