Laserfiche WebLink
#14-3686 Northern Oalcs <br /> March 5,2015 <br /> Page 3 <br /> basement. Where some visual relief from the uniformity of 6 new 55-foot wide homes on <br /> 75-foot wide lots could be had by the middle two homes having lower 1-1/2 story rooflines, <br /> allowing the proposed grading plan revisions will accommodate the applicants' desired 2- <br /> story homes. The visual impact of these homes, either with or without a revised grading plan <br /> approval, will be significantly less stark than the row of homes on Maple Place,primarily <br /> because of the variety of facade designs and the variable setbacks from the road(see Ezhibit <br /> E). <br /> Marketabilitv Please review the applicants' submitted materials. Applicants suggest that there <br /> is no demand for 1-story or 1-1/2 story homes, and that the site constraints restricting buildable <br /> lot area are extremely limiting for Lots 3 and 4, making it difficult to provide the market-desired <br /> space and amenities within a 1-1/2 story envelope. <br /> Analysis <br /> It was clear all during the subdivision review process that Lots 3 and 4 would be restricted in <br /> terms of flexibility of house location. There was virtually no discussion in the record as to <br /> whether these constraints made it imperative that homes with a basement and 2 full stories <br /> needed to be accommodated. The grading plans merely suggested that each house was set at an <br /> elevation that would accommodate a walkout. <br /> In staff's opinion there are pros and cons to allowing the extent of fill necessary to make Lots 3 <br /> and 4 accommodate the homes intended by the applicants. It can be argued that the grading plan <br /> should have been approved on the basis that it did create new existing grades for determining <br /> building heights; but there was no intent on the developers' part to bring in fill to physically <br /> create new building pads until individual homes were built. The City has no control over sale of <br /> vacant lots, and the applicants could have just as easily sold the lots to other builders who have a <br /> completely different idea of what to build on the lots. T'he lots could sit vacant for many years. <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff does not want an approval to act as a precedent for generally allowing the use of fill to <br /> artificially raise the grade next to a foundation in order to make a defined story into a basement. <br /> If Council chooses to approve the requested grading plan changes, it should be documented as an <br /> amendment of the subdivision approvals to allow the overall site improvement grading to include <br /> establishment of new existing grades for building height determination, based on the original <br /> intent of the developer. <br /> COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br /> Council should review the applicants' request and if approval is warranted, direct staff to prepare <br /> an amendment of the Development Agreement docuxnenting the approval. <br />