02-09-2015 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, y ► MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COlVIlVIISSION MEETING Tuesday,January 20,2015 6:30 o'clock p.m. The proposed addition will result in almost no change to the site layout or site usage. T'he addition will not result in significant changes to access to the building or vehicular tr�c patterns within the site. The existing site plan is in compliance with past approvals. The overhead door for the portion of the addition slated for vehicle storage is facing into the site to the south and should not impact properties to the north. Staff finds that Items 2,6, 7, 8, 9, and 13 of the conditional use per�� applies in this situation and are outlined in Staff's report. It is Staff's believe the proposed addition to provide�di�nal oftTc�, locker r9om space will not result in a notable intensification of the site as the ' k a�d��pmer� t�ffi�e s��rill not increase. T'he proposal should have virtually no negat�' �adjacent p ' ��ill there be negative impacts in terms of stormwater or site usage. � recommend,ho�,f�at future requests to increase the hardcover on the site not be apprr�. Staff recommends approval of a conditional use permit for the prop ' n and approval of the site plan, subject to the following conditions: One, ad �o the approv�d p�t;Two,the building permit application will be subject to engineer,buildin�o�ci�l,�l f�e marshal re�; and Three, subject to MCWD approval. The Planning Commission had no questior��`Staff. The applicant had nothing to add to S�'s report. Chair Leskinen opened the publ�c 'ng at 7:58 p.�.t. There were no public commer�s �this application. Chair Les ' c �public he ' �'7:58 p.m. Leski��ed the app' �pretty strai��ard and that she does not have any concerns with the pro ver asked if the MCVV� be conducting any evaluation to determine whether the stormwater pq�14`c�tructed in 2000 is still ' nal. � Curtis �part of the build' j�rnit review,the building inspector will review it as well as the MCWD.C�ti� in her v�e��rvill be addressed if it is an issue. Landgraver stat��c�l t��v if this would be the appropriate place to determine whether it is still functioning. Leskinen noted the memorandum from the MSB does talk about the stormwater pond. Leskinen stated to her recollection it triggers a stormwater management rule that requires best management practices to be incorporated into the project. Leskinen stated the memorandum appears to address some of that. Landgraver stated in his view he felt this would be a good opportunity to review that,but that he is not sure whether it is within the Planning Commission's purview. Curtis stated she will make a note of that and consult with the City Attorney. Page 14 of 21