Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE - <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,December 8,2014 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (22. 20I5 NON-UNIONEMPLOYEE COMPENSATIONADJIISTMENTS—RESOLUTIONNO. <br /> 6479, Continued) <br /> Bremer stated she would encourage the City Council approve the 2.5 percent increase with a pledge <br /> commitment on the part of the City Council to get assistance to analyze the appropriate pay brackets for <br /> each job and the competitive nature of the pay scale. Bremer stated if one of the concerns is that the pay <br /> ranges are getting out of line as compared to the rest of the market,the City Council should have that <br /> data. <br /> McMillan noted the City is not talking about cutting wages but rather stabilizing the wages going into the <br /> future. McMillan stated in her view Orono has the right mixture of employees but that they also need to <br /> do some other projects as the tax base grows that the citizens want the City to do that have been deferred. <br /> McMillan stated the budget is a balancing act and that it needs to be sustainable for the City going <br /> forward. <br /> Levang indicated she is in agreement with Mayor McMillan. Levang asked if a decision needs to be <br /> made tonight and what the ramifications would be if it is not approved tonight. <br /> Mattick noted typically the City's raises have taken effect January 1. Mattick stated the Attorney General <br /> has issued an opinion on retroactive payments and that a collective bargaining agreement can account for <br /> retroactive payxnents if the City is in the process of negotiating with the bargaining unions. Mattick <br /> stated the City does not have the same ability to do the retroactive payment with non-union employees <br /> and that the Attorney General has said that that payment essentially amounts to a bonus or a gift. Mattick <br /> stated if the Council is looking to have the rate go into effect January 1,the decision needs to be made <br /> tonight. <br /> Loftus stated what would happen on January 1 is the employees would actually revert to 2013 wages. <br /> The resolution adopted last year was explicit and said at the end of 2014 the lump sum goes away,which <br /> has been accommodated for in the budget. Loftus stated it would not be status quo come January 1 and <br /> that the employees would revert back to their 2013 wages. <br /> McMillan stated if there was a hybrid that totals 2.5 percent, she would be willing to consider that. <br /> Bremer suggested 1.5 percent COLA and 1 percent lump sum. <br /> Printup stated it would be a disservice to everybody if the Council did not approve something tonight. <br /> Levang stated what the Council is leaning towards is having a total of 2.5 percent but part of that would <br /> be a lump sum and part would be COLA. <br /> Loftus stated her preference would be that the 1.5 percent be the COLA since it would allow the 2014 <br /> wages to continue and not revert back to 2013 wages. <br /> Printup stated he is comfortable with that. <br /> Page 20 of 26 <br />