Laserfiche WebLink
' � t� � � ��� � � �� � ��� <br /> � �,� � �,.+-'l��� 4 �G�i,�Y� �t t�t,��� i i <br /> REQUEST FUR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> DATE: 4ctober 9, 199$ <br /> ITEM NO.: l� <br /> Department Approval: Administrator eviewed: Agenda Section: <br /> Name Gregory A.Gappa Public Services <br /> Title Dircctor of Public Services <br /> Item Description: Revised Assessment Roll Resolution for Shoreline/Heritage Sanitary Sewer <br /> Project-Resolution <br /> Construction is nearly complete on this project with sodding and paving of the final lift of <br /> bituminous pavement in 19991eft to be completed. Construction went very well for this project, <br /> with no unexpected problems, so the project costs are substantialiy lower than estimated. The <br /> original assessment mll,which was adopted at the June 29th assessment of$19,i 00 per unit. This <br /> was based on 20 properties being assessed for the project <br /> There are two lots that were platted in the ariginal subdivision that have been owned by an adjacent <br /> landowner outside the subdivision ever since the lots were platted. These were purchased to provide <br /> a buffer between the subdivisian and the adjacent parcel. This subdivision was platted in the 1960's <br /> before the current zoning regulations were in effect, so all of the lots in the subdivision are non- <br /> confornung and are all approxirnately one acre in size. The original proposal was not to assess the <br /> two vacant non-conforming lots,so as to not imply any zoning ar development rights for these lots. <br /> Also the property owner has no intention of selling or development these lots,at this time,and would <br /> have likely appealed the assessment. <br /> The assessment of these #wa vacant lots was questioned by one of the citizens at the assessment <br /> heaxing. The Council inclicated that based on the development of a1i of the other lo#s,the two vacant <br /> lots would most likely be considered buildable in the fiuture. Development of these lots withseptic <br /> would be dif�cult,but with sanitary sewer available,it would be feasible to develop these lots. The <br /> Council directed staffta review the ability of these parcels,and to include them in the project for the <br /> calculation of the per-unit assessments if staff found that they would most likely be considered <br /> buildable. Staff is recommending these lots be included in the calculation of the per-unit <br /> assessments. This will lower the unit cost for all of the other properties in the project. The City will <br /> carry the costs for these lots until they are developed at which time the costs will be covered through <br /> a connection fee. <br /> Due to costs substantially lower than estimated, and based on the costs for project completion <br /> distributed over 22 parceis, versus the origina120 pazcels, the per unit project assessment will be <br /> $15,500. The feasibility study assessment estimate was $19,100 per unit. <br />