Laserfiche WebLink
Sex offenders and victims • 31 <br />What remains to be addressed is the third element of routine activities: the <br />presence of capable guardians. Routine activities theory states that the presence of <br />capable guardians should reduce the likelihood of direct-contact predatory viola- <br />tions. According to the theory, the actions taken by police officers and others to <br />make day cares, schools, and residents of these areas aware of the presence of child <br />sex offenders should increase the number of and/or effectiveness of capable guard- <br />ians. The relationship between the presence of police and their notification of <br />residents and inhabitants of an area was not explored by this research. It can be <br />argued, however, that their actions could have a important impact on the poten- <br />tial level of sex offenses in an area. The police cannot serve as the sole source of <br />capable guardianship in controlling sex offenses, however. They are too few in num- <br />ber, and they cannot always be present when motivated offenders and potential <br />victims converge in time and space. What the police can do, however, is to make <br />as many people in the neighborhood (especially those who are guardians of po- <br />tential victims or may be potential victims themselves) aware of the presence of a <br />potentially motivated offender. This can be done by the very actions that are <br />being taken—registering sex offenders and notifying the community of their pres- <br />ence. If it can be determined that these actions are having the desired effect, then <br />the tripartite relationship central to routine activities theory is supported. <br />*Conclusion <br />The goal of this research was to examine the possibility of a link between where <br />child sex offenders choose to live and potential targets. We believe that we have <br />found this link. Our findings support the argument that there is a definite con- <br />vergence of potentially motivated child sex offenders living in close proximity to <br />concentrations of potential victims. <br />The policy implications of this research directly relate to the resources and <br />efforts of sex offender registration and notification. It is not possible for govern- <br />ments or other entities to control the locations of potential targets (day cares, <br />schools, and parks). Furthermore, despite governmental efforts, there is no evi- <br />dence that attempts to limit where sex offenders live have been successful. Rou- <br />tine activities theory argues that crime increases when there is a convergence of <br />motivated offenders and potential targets in the absence of capable guardians. <br />This research has shown that there appears to be a convergence of offenders and <br />potential targets in the county we studied. Even if the argument that child sex <br />offenders are choosing to live in these areas because of potential targets is re- <br />jected, the fact remains that there is a substantial number of child sex offenders <br />living in close proximity to potential targets.