My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
08-22-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2016 3:59:52 PM
Creation date
12/16/2016 3:53:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
12/16/2016 3:59 PM
Modified:
12/16/2016 3:59 PM
Text:
http://cjb.sagepub.com
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
502 CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR <br />Multiple prior sex-crime convictions: Offenders with more than one prior sex-crime <br />conviction (including the instant offense) were given a value of 1, whereas those without <br />multiple prior sex crime convictions were given a value of 0. <br />Recent disciplinary history: This variable measures the number of disciplinary convictions <br />that an offender received in the final 12 months prior to his initial release from prison. <br />Sex offender treatment: Three dichotomous dummy variables were created to measure <br />prison-based sex offender treatment during the offender’s term of imprisonment prior to <br />release. Offenders’ involvement in sex offender treatment was not included, however, if <br />they participated in treatment during either a prior commitment to prison or a subsequent <br />return to prison (either for a supervised release violation or for the new sex reoffense). <br />The three variables were offenders who successfully completed treatment or were participating <br />until the time of release (1 =treatment completers/participants; 0 =treatment dropouts <br />or nonparticipants), offenders who were terminated from treatment or voluntarily <br />quit (1 =treatment dropouts; 0 =treatment completers/participants or nonparticipants), <br />and those who never entered treatment (1 =nonparticipants; 0 =treatment completers/ <br />participants, and dropouts). <br />Length of postrelease supervision: The number of months between an offender’s first <br />release date and the end of postrelease supervision, for example, the sentence expiration <br />or conditional release date, the greater of the two. <br />Intensity of postrelease supervision: Three dichotomous dummy variables were created to <br />measure the level of postrelease supervision to which offenders were released. The three <br />variables were intensive supervised release (ISR) (1 =ISR,0 =non-ISR), supervised <br />release (SR) (1 =SR,0 =non-SR), and discharge (1 =discharge or no supervision,0 = <br />released to supervision).4 <br />Supervised release revocations (SRR’s): The number of times during an offender’s sex <br />crime sentence when he returned to prison as a supervised release violator. <br />Prior victim gender: Dichotomized as either a female victim (1) or a male victim (2), this <br />variable measures whether offenders victimized a female or male victim in the sex <br />offense for which they were previously incarcerated. Victim gender was coded the same <br />for the reoffense. <br />Prior victim age: Three dichotomous dummy variables were created to measure the age of <br />the victim for the sex offense for which the recidivists were previously incarcerated. The <br />three variables were child victims (1 =victim younger than the age of 13; 0 =victims 13 <br />and older), adolescent victims (1 =victims between the ages of 13 and 17; 0 =child and <br />adult victims), and adult victims (1 =victims older than age 17; 0 =victims younger than <br />age 18). The same coding structure was used for the victim’s age in the reoffense. <br />Prior victim–offender relationship: Three dichotomous dummy variables were created to <br />measure the offender’s relationship to the victim for the sex crime for which he was <br />previously incarcerated. The three variables were stranger victims (1 =stranger victim; <br />0 =known or nonstranger victim), acquaintance victims (1 =acquaintance victim; <br />0 =nonacquaintance victim), and family member victims (1 =family member <br />victim; 0 =non-family-member victim). Victim–offender relationship was coded the <br />same for the reoffense. <br />APPENDIX (continued) <br /> at University of British Columbia Library on April 27, 2010 http://cjb.sagepub.comDownloaded from
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.