My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
06-27-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2016 9:39:09 AM
Creation date
12/16/2016 9:31:30 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
405
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CliftonLarsonAllen LLP <br />CLAconnect.com <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Management <br />City of Orono <br />Orono, Minnesota <br /> <br />In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of City of Orono (the City) as of and for <br />the year ended December 31, 2015, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the <br />United States of America, we considered the City’s internal control over financial reporting (internal <br />control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the <br />purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an <br />opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on <br />the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. <br /> <br />However, during our audit, we became aware of several matters that are opportunities for strengthening <br />internal control and operating efficiency. Our comments and suggestions regarding those matters are <br />summarized below. A separate communication dated June 21, 2016, contains our written <br />communication of significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the City’s internal control. This <br />letter does not affect our communication dated June 21, 2016. <br /> <br />Documentation of Review and Approval <br />We noted during the audit that aged receivables reports did not contain documentation of the review <br />procedures. Generally, a system of internal control contemplates having someone other than the <br />preparer review the reports prepared, and documentation of this review should be retained. <br /> <br />Accounts Receivable Write-offs <br />Currently it is the City’s practice to allow the finance department to approve credits posted to customer <br />accounts provided that they are small dollar amounts. City Council approval is required before any <br />large credits can be made. However, the City has not established a dollar threshold over which would <br />require City Council approval for account credits. We recommend that the City establish a more formal <br />credit policy which includes a dollar limit to credits which can be initiated and approved by the <br />accounting department. <br /> <br />Cash Receipts Reconciliation <br />We noted during audit procedures that a daily reconciliation of cash receipts is not being performed by <br />the City. The City’s policy indicates that cashier funds are counted and reconciled at the end of each <br />shift. Additionally, reconciliations are to be reviewed by the supervisor. As there is no compensating <br />control, we recommend that daily cash reconciliations be performed by an individual different than the <br />individual receiving cash. <br /> <br />Check Signing <br />During our audit procedures, we noted that check signers are solely reviewing a general disbursement <br />register before signing checks instead of reviewing supporting documentation for disbursements. We <br />recommend that check signers review the supporting documentation for disbursements prior to signing <br />checks. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.