My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
10-13-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 2:34:26 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 2:34:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 13, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 12 of 21 <br />(8. #14-3690 TONKA LAKE PROPERTIES, LLC, 1565 ORCHARD BEACH PLACE (PID <br />07-117-23-43-0026), VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Continued) <br /> <br />Wes Delton, 1535 Orchard Beach Place, stated he is opposed to the project. Delton stated for 50-plus <br />years it has been an unbuildable lot and that compared to the other lots around it, it will not fit in. Delton <br />indicated his wife is also opposed to the project. <br /> <br />Lisa Wysocki noted the lot was declared unbuildable several times in the past. Wysocki stated it is her <br />understanding the purchaser of the property in 1980 was told it was unbuildable by the City Council and <br />two neighbors. Wysocki stated in her view this was a bad investment. <br />Levang stated this is a difficult situation since it has been denied a number of times in the past and that in <br />reading through the file, there are a number of issues associated with developing the lot. <br /> <br />McMillan stated drainage is a big issue. <br /> <br />Levang stated a person can visually see how the lot dips down dramatically. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if they are proposing a basement. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated they are not but that it would be a two-story residence. Gaffron indicated the back end <br />of the house would be tucked into the hill slightly. <br /> <br />Printup asked what has been looked at by Staff relating to the water issues. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated there are several photos in the packet that show how the drainage goes from the northeast <br />part of the property down towards the center of the property. The applicants are proposing to do some <br />drainage in that area so the runoff essentially will follow the road ditch but that most of the runoff will go <br />to the lake across the 0-75 foot zone. Gaffron stated the proposed grading plan gets them as close as 40 <br />feet to the lake to do the grading but that they could certainly do grading that makes the water go around <br />the house. <br /> <br />McMillan asked what is in the middle or lower right of the lot. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated they are proposing to show that the drainage goes into that area. The applicants are also <br />proposing a 15-inch culvert underneath the driveway so essentially the water will drain from the north <br />side of the house to a culvert under the driveway and then down to the lake. On the west side of the lot <br />there would be grading between the house and the lot line to make sure the drainage gets past the house. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if a number of trees would need to be removed in order to accomplish the drainage. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated it is Staff’s impression that a number of trees would be impacted by the grading. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.