Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 13, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />  Page 11 of 21  <br />(8. #14-3690 TONKA LAKE PROPERTIES, LLC, 1565 ORCHARD BEACH PLACE (PID <br />07-117-23-43-0026), VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Continued) <br /> <br />Haugan stated the proposed house is pretty modest. Haugan stated he heard comments about how the <br />neighboring lots are huge, but they were once platted as small individual 50-foot lots. Haugan noted this <br />is an 83-foot wide lot, 100 feet deep, and abuts a road. The assessed value of the property is <br />approximately $75,000 currently, and once a house is constructed, the assessed value will go up to <br />$600,000 to $700,000. Haugan noted the road serves no one other than the two neighbors above, with the <br />rest of the road being exclusively for this property. <br /> <br />Haugan stated in his view Staff’s report is absolutely wrong in determining whether this is a buildable lot. <br />Haugan indicated the applicants would like a setback from a back and a side that offends no one, and that <br />if there are neighbors here that are complaining, the only two that would have any dog in this fight would <br />be the people who live 20 feet higher than this proposed house and that their view of the lake is obstructed <br />by the massive trees on the subject property. Haugan stated it is his belief the lake views are not an issue. <br /> <br />Haugan stated as it relates to the effect the variance would have on government services, there would be <br />none since the property is readily accessible by a road. Whether the variance will affect substantial <br />change in the character of the neighborhood is not true. Haugan stated the biggest disruption to the <br />neighborhood was the 9,000 square foot, $4 million house that was allowed to be constructed across the <br />street, which is an aberration in the neighborhood. Haugan stated the 1,050 to 1,200 square foot floor <br />plan being proposed is identical to the two residences above this lot. <br /> <br />Haugan stated as to whether the practical difficulty could be alleviated by a feasible method other than <br />variance is not possible since the property cannot be made bigger. Haugan stated the applicants also did <br />not create this practical difficulty and that it resulted from over 100 years of changes in various laws. The <br />property will become, if a variance is not granted, functionally obsolete. <br /> <br />Haugan stated the final criteria in light of all of the above factors; a variance would serve the interests of <br />justice. Haugan asked what is wrong with building a modest house, raising a family, and paying taxes on <br />it. Haugan stated in the grand scheme of things, this is all positive. <br /> <br />Haugan stated the applicants are requesting the variance be granted and that in his view the request is <br />modest. <br /> <br />Lisa Wysocki, 1555 Orchard Beach Place, stated this lot serves as a drain field for a six acre piece of land <br />and that it is continually swampy and very wet. Wysocki stated there is a corner on their property that is <br />also very low and that there can be a foot of standing water following a heavy rain. Wysocki stated she <br />has a concern that the drainage problems will be made worse if this piece of property is developed. <br /> <br />Wysocki stated she has also been told that Orchard Beach Place is a fire lane and that there is a lift station <br />at the end of the road. Orono trucks are down there every single day. Wysocki stated shortening the <br />driveway would eliminate parking for those trucks and/or guest parking. In addition, the neighborhood <br />likes to use the public access. <br /> <br />Wysocki stated in her view the proposed house would block her view since it is far in front of the average <br />lakeshore setback and that they are opposed to all of the variances. <br />