My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-22-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
09-22-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 2:33:18 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 2:32:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 22, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 10 of 18 <br />(7. #14-3682 JAMES AND MARGARET KELLY, 1855 CONCORDIA STREET – AFTER-THE- <br />FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – RESOLUTION NO. 6449, Continued) <br /> <br />Curtis indicated it would be the south side. <br /> <br />Kelly stated the two trees killed by the contractor were outside of the 0-75 foot zone and that they will be <br />replacing those with five spruce trees. Kelly stated out of the three trees that were removed, two were <br />dead and the other one was sheared off at the top. Kelly noted those trees were not located down by the <br />lake. Kelly stated with the trees they will be planting, they will be positive quite a few trees, but that he is <br />curious about what tree on the north or south side was affected because he is unaware of any. <br /> <br />Levang stated the neighbor referenced a tree in his letter to the City. <br /> <br />Mrs. Kelly stated the neighbor has stated he had some dirt pushed on his yard and that it may possibly <br />affect one tree located partially on his property, but that she has a picture showing the willow is alive and <br />growing. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly stated according to the way the yard is staked, that tree is on their property. Kelly stated all of <br />the neighbors have clear cut their yards and that he is planting additional trees on his property. <br /> <br />Levang noted the City Council is speaking about the applicants’ property and not what happened on other <br />properties. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly stated they are taking extreme care to protect the land and the character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Bremer asked where the Mayor is thinking about adding the language regarding the inspections. <br /> <br />McMillan stated it could be added on Page 3. <br /> <br />Bremer suggested it be incorporated before Item No. 10. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the language could simply say that Staff shall inspect the site for conformance with the <br />plan that has been submitted sometime in 2015 and sometime in 2016. Mattick stated he is aware there is <br />concern about the maple tree, but that the City is limited on what they can do about that. Mattick stated at <br />this point it appears to be alive and doing fine and that it may have been more of an expressed concern <br />since some grading did occur on the neighbor’s property. <br /> <br />Levang asked whether the escrow should be increased given the fact that Staff will be conducting <br />inspections. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the escrow is to secure compliance with the plan and that he is not sure whether that would <br />be necessary. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the $700 escrow is the typical CUP review escrow and that the administrative permit <br />following this approval is typically based on an amount that the City Engineer recommends. <br /> <br />Mack stated the typical amount associated with that is $2,000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.