My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-08-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
09-08-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 2:32:58 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 2:32:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 8, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 8 of 25 <br />(6. #14-3675 RYAN AND STACY ALNESS, XXX ELMWOOD AVENUE/PID 07-117-23-11-0027 <br />– VARIANCES, Continued) <br /> <br />5. The applicants meet the elements of practical difficulty and ask for approval of the variance <br /> request. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated he has provided the standards for a practical difficulty in the Council’s packet. Staff <br />acknowledges that the lot is not functionally buildable unless an average lakeshore setback variance is <br />granted. If the Council finds that an average lakeshore setback variance should be granted, then that <br />action must be accompanied by an action to extinguish the Special Lot Combination Agreement in order <br />for the variance to be granted. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted if the Council determines that an average setback variance should be granted, the Council <br />should direct Staff to draft a resolution incorporating findings that support such an action. If the Council <br />determines that special conditions must be imposed to mitigate any special impacts created by the <br />granting of the requested variance, the Council should define those conditions. Further, the Council <br />should direct the City Attorney to prepare whatever documents are necessary to extinguish the Special <br />Lot Combination. <br />Gaffron noted if the Council determines that an average setback variance should not be granted, Staff <br />should be directed to draft a resolution for denial, incorporating the reasons for denial. <br /> <br />Morgan Kavanaugh, Attorney-at-Law, stated he represents Ryan and Stacy Alness and that he would like <br />to make two quick points. As to the building plans, as Staff has pointed out; the proposed house is <br />modest in size and fits in with the neighborhood. The applicants have also worked with an engineer and <br />City Staff to resolve the access issues that were created by the lift station. In addition, the lot already has <br />a sewer line ready to go. <br /> <br />Kavanaugh noted as to the average lakeshore setback, the practical difficulty was not caused by the <br />applicants’ plan. As pointed by Staff, the lot would be functionally unbuildable due to the Special Lot <br />Combination Agreement of the neighboring lot and Special Lot Combination Agreements are rare and <br />unique to certain lots throughout the City. <br /> <br />Kavanaugh stated the purpose of the average lakeshore setback line is to protect lake views and avoid a <br />tunnel view of the lake. Kavanaugh noted there will be no tunnel view in this situation since the <br />neighbor’s house is above this house. As the applicants’ lot currently sits now, there are mature trees that <br />are more than double the size of the proposed house. <br /> <br />Mark Thieroff, Attorney-at-Law, stated he represents Renee Meerkins and Claus Weiler, who reside at <br />1135 North Arm Drive, which is immediately north of the subject property. Thieroff noted the Planning <br />Commission has previously looked at this issue in depth and that he will not repeat that discussion. <br /> <br />Thieroff stated the first point he would like to discuss tonight is the issue of whether the lot is buildable at <br />all. As the Council knows, the zoning code has a one acre minimum requirement in this zone. At the <br />August 18 Planning Commission meeting, Staff responded to a question by Chair Leskinen by stating that <br />the lot would not be substandard and could be built on because of a statute amendment in 2009 that <br />allows existing lots of record to be built on. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.