Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 8, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />  Page 18 of 25  <br />(11. #14-3684 LAKEWEST, LLC, ON BEHALF OF HOWARD EISINGER TRUST, 3245 <br />WAYZATA BOULEVARD – SKETCH PLAN REVIEW, Continued) <br /> <br />Jensen stated they see the target market as being people who are either empty-nesters or people with <br />children in high school but do not have the time to perform yard maintenance. There will be a <br />homeowners association, irrigation around the perimeter, and various recreational amenities. Jensen stated <br />they are looking for Council direction and input on what they are proposing tonight. <br /> <br />Rick Harrison, Harrison Site Design, stated they are utilizing software that allows a person to view the <br />development from a panoramic 3D perspective to see exactly how the buildings are designed in relation to <br />the topography. Harrison stated the software basically will enable the Council to view the development <br />from different perspectives both inside and outside the unit. Harrison noted the software is based on <br />engineered surveying and that the topography they are seeing is what actually exists on the site. <br /> <br />Harrison indicated under their proposal, the units are staggered and coordinated to enable everyone to <br />have a panoramic view of the area. Harrison indicated some of the units will be walkouts and quite a few <br />of the units will have three-car garages. Harrison stated until the final survey is completed, they are not <br />committed to the number of units, but that in his view this general layout is probably pretty close to what <br />is realistic for the site. <br /> <br />Harrison noted there are a number of trees along the edge of the right-of-way and that the idea is to have a <br />walking path along Highway 12 that would connect this neighborhood to the high school. Harrison stated <br />the software depicts the major trees in the locations that they are in and that care has been taken to locate <br />the units in locations where the trees will not need to be removed. <br /> <br />Harrison stated they did revise their plans slightly to address the comments of the Planning Commission, <br />including widening the roadway and eliminating some of the shared driveways. <br /> <br />McMillan states she appreciates the ability to look at the development from different perspectives. <br /> <br />Levang noted the plan does not reflect a turnout for the driveways. <br /> <br />Gaffron asked if she is referring to the bump-outs. <br /> <br />Levang stated she is. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the bump-outs are to accommodate parking for visitors to the units and would be necessary <br />on a 24-foot roadway. Gaffron indicated the Stonebay development has bump-outs given some of the <br />narrow roadways and that once the development is totally built out, it may be likely that parking will <br />become a premium. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated in this situation, there is space for at least two vehicles in the driveway and that some of <br />the units have additional parking available. Gaffron stated if there were more homes than the proposed 26 <br />units, additional parking would be required. <br /> <br />Jensen stated in the Stonebay development, parking is more critical in certain locations, but that they will <br />look at the parking needs closer as they refine their plans. <br />