Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 28, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />  Page 7 of 17  <br /> (4. #13-3638 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, 405 NORTH ARM DRIVE – LAKEVIEW GOLF <br />COURSE ROPERTY – CONTINUED SKETCH PLAN REVIEW, Continued) <br /> <br />Bremer stated safety impacts would be an important piece since the residents have raised concerns over <br />the safety of intersections. Bremer stated in her view the topography is challenging as well as the <br />intersections and that those things will need to be taken into consideration by the traffic consultants. <br /> <br />Hiller noted there was an accident up the road a few weeks ago but that it was not a result of the <br />intersection. Hiller stated there was a lane closure and the person ran into the car that was stopped ahead <br />of him. Hiller stated he will go ahead and have a traffic study performed. Hiller asked if Staff has a <br />particular entity or individual in mind. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the City Engineer did a traffic study for Stone Bay approximately 12 years ago, which is <br />an option in this situation, but that he does not have a particular recommendation on who should do the <br />study. <br /> <br />Mattick stated any outside study that is done would be turned over to the City Engineer to review. <br /> <br />Hiller stated he will go ahead and contact a private consultant named Data Sources that his engineer is <br />familiar with. Hiller stated the traffic study will hopefully be completed by the time of preliminary plat. <br /> <br />Bremer stated in that example provided by Mr. Gaffron there were some raw numbers that were provided <br />by someone else and then the City Engineer looked at those. Bremer stated to her recollection the City <br />took a more active role in that study. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated he does not have any issues with the applicant hiring a private consultant but that Staff will <br />check into Data Sources to make sure we have no issues with them. <br /> <br />Levang stated as it relates to Exhibit D, which is Hennepin County’s traffic analysis of County Road 19 <br />and the North Arm Drive intersection, it talks about the entering sight distance for vehicles from North <br />Arm Drive entering on to County Road 19 meets the minimum sight distance that is required, which is <br />500 feet, but dos meet the desirable sight distance of 700 feet from the intersection looking north. Levang <br />stated she would encourage the applicant to review that data and how that can be mitigated since that is <br />one of the concerns that has been raised by the neighbors. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the next step in the process is to bring the preliminary plat before the Planning <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated it would be. <br /> <br />Hiller stated they would hope to have the preliminary plat application to the City by the end of August. <br /> <br />McMillan noted there would be a public hearing before the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Hiller stated the EAW comment period expires on August 6. <br /> <br />