Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 12, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />  Page 7 of 16  <br />(4. NEW JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE – PIRATES COVE [850-860 WINDJAMMER LANE], <br />Continued) <br /> <br />McMillan asked what kind of notification would be done. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated if a public hearing is held, since it is not specifically required, he would recommend that <br />notice be given to any property owners 150 feet out from the two riparian properties, which would likely <br />result in two additional property owners being notified. <br /> <br />A person in the audience noted the LMCD would also be holding a public hearing. <br /> <br />Printup asked if the public hearing would delay anything since this matter would still need to come back <br />before the City Council in two weeks. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated the issue is what type of notice should be given. Staff would likely send out the notices <br />at the end of the week, which would allow for a 10-day notice. Gaffron noted the six property owners are <br />in attendance tonight. <br /> <br />John Biglow, Attorney-at-Law, stated he represents the Broghammers, who are easement owners and that <br />the other easement owners are also present as well as their counsel. Biglow stated the issue of a public <br />hearing is a little more unique in this situation in that all the parties that are directly affected by the <br />easement are either present or represented by counsel. Biglow indicated the negotiated settlement <br />between the parties is that the necessity of a public hearing is up to the discretion of the Council and noted <br />that there will be additional steps that they will have to go through with the LMCD. <br /> <br />McMillan noted joint dock uses are fairly unique in Orono and a new one has not been added in quite <br />some time. McMillan stated the City Council needs to take the entire neighborhood into consideration <br />before making a decision. <br /> <br />McMillan stated oftentimes the Council will hold the public hearing and then also vote on the resolution. <br /> <br />Bremer asked if there is sufficient time to issue public notice. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated a 10-day notice is required and that notice will be mailed to the affected property owners <br />by the end of the week. Gaffron stated the notice will not be published but simply mailed. <br /> <br />Levang indicated she would prefer to hold a public hearing and then vote on the resolution. <br /> <br />Bremer stated if one of the affected homeowners is watching the meeting tonight, that also provides <br />notice, and that she is fine with holding the public hearing at the next City Council meeting. <br /> <br />Bremer moved, Printup seconded, to direct Staff to draft a resolution approving Dock Layout <br />Option B, consistent with the conditions outlined in Staff’s report, with the understanding that the <br />owners of Lots 6 and 7 will be limited to three dock slips, and to direct Staff to provide notice of a <br />public hearing to the affected property owners. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br /> <br />