Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 12, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />  Page 6 of 16  <br />(4. NEW JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE – PIRATES COVE [850-860 WINDJAMMER LANE], <br />Continued) <br /> <br />Harris indicated the parties have been in very detailed settlement discussions about the exact <br />configuration and the parties recognize that the continuation of the easement would be a permitted <br />nonconforming use. Harris noted the parties will adhere to the existing easement but will restate some of <br />its terms to eliminate any issues of further dispute. The parties intend to proceed with the easement but <br />simply detail those disputed items, which will not affect the configuration or location. Harris stated the <br />parties are in support of an approval by the City Council. <br /> <br />Gaffron asked if there are any conditions that are being proposed to be placed on the Joint Use Dock <br />License by Staff that would conflict with the parties’ agreement. Gaffron asked if there is an issue with <br />the limitation of the three docks serving the two riparian property owners. <br /> <br />Harris stated the riparian owners recognize they will have a total of three docks available. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if that settlement information could be passed on to Staff in the next couple of weeks. <br /> <br />Harris indicated they will provide that and that it will be the same easement except for more specificity on <br />some items to eliminate any risk of future disagreement. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated he is not sure what type of stair system is necessary or what exists and asked if there are <br />any plans for a walking system down to the lake. <br /> <br />Harris stated there is and that steps will be taken to enhance and safeguard the drainage and erosion issues <br />as well as protection against contamination of the lake by reason of the drainage. Harris indicated they <br />have been dealing with Staff and part of the settlement is that the City separately approves some plans <br />that have been submitted for drainage and configuration. Harris indicated there have been some issues <br />regarding erosion that has been caused by the existing walkway, which would be eradicated under this <br />plan. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if a conditional use permit would be required for grading in the 0-75 foot zone. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated it would depend on the extent of the disturbance and that Staff has not seen a formal plan <br />at this point. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated if it is a single stairway that meets the City’s standards; it may not need to come before the <br />City Council. <br /> <br />Harris noted there is a long-time existing drainage system there and the new plan would eliminate some <br />erosion issues. Harris stated the plan will be submitted jointly by the parties. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the City Council should determine whether a public hearing is necessary. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the public hearing could be held in two weeks and that Staff would notify the affected <br />property owners. Gaffron noted the notice would not be published. Gaffron stated if the Council deems a <br />public hearing is not necessary, Staff would simply bring back a resolution at the May 27 meeting. <br />