My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3986 - unrecorded
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3900 - 3999 (May 12, 1997 - November 10, 1997)
>
Resolution 3986 - unrecorded
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:28 PM
Creation date
12/6/2016 2:37:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� O� <br /> O O <br /> ��b= - CITY of ORONO <br /> � ' ti <br /> �� �,'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> • �`q$ESHO�`'�' NO. e� 9 � F3 <br /> A. The property is unique for a number of reasons, including its age, its <br /> history and the fact that applicants have been diligently restoring the <br /> property to its former splendor. <br /> B. The proposed work involves restoration of amenities or structures which <br /> already exist, and does not propose any new buildings or amenities. <br /> C. The 650' length of the eastern shoreline justifies the existence of as many <br /> as four lakeshore stairways to provide access to the lake from the higher <br /> portions of the property which are as much as 25' above lake level, and <br /> the steep slopes east of the house suggest the need for stairway access. <br /> 4. On October 20, 1997 the Orono Planning Commission reviewed this request for <br /> variance renewal and on a vote of 6-0 recommended approval, finding that the <br /> findings and conditions of the prior approval as noted in Resolution No. 3786 <br /> are still valid and appropriate. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> 6. The City Council fmds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hazdship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.