My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2014
>
01-27-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 1:59:07 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 1:58:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 27, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 28 of 32 <br /> <br />(6. NORTH WATER TOWER REPAINTING PROJECT, Continued) <br /> <br />Struve indicated he would recommend the 10-year warranty. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the additional five years would cost $80,000 more. <br /> <br />Struve stated the American Water Works Association has guidelines for maintenance of a water tower, <br />and they recommend at the 5-year mark that a pressure wash and inspection be completed, which would <br />be included in the cost of the contract. Struve indicated the cost might not be that high if they went out <br />for bid, but that it would be in that vicinity. The additional costs would be for the yearly inspections, <br />which perhaps could be scaled back to every other year. Struve stated the elimination of one or two <br />inspections is what the City would be saving by not going into a maintenance agreement. <br /> <br />Levang asked if the City would be able to enter into a new 5-year or 10-year contract after the first <br />contract expires. <br /> <br />Spragg indicated that is correct and that they would be happy if an overcoat lasts 20 years. <br /> <br />Levang asked if the Council could have some flexibility with the yearly inspections and modify the <br />contract. <br />Spragg indicated the annual inspection is SEH’s way of protecting themselves and that they attempt to <br />keep the inspection costs as low as possible. <br /> <br />McMillan asked whether the City would be able to enter into a 5-year contract and then later extend that. <br /> <br />Spragg stated the City does have that option but noted the costs are adjusted for inflation in year’s six to <br />ten and that he cannot guarantee the costs will be that. <br /> <br />McMillan stated if the City Council elects to go with SEH, she would recommend the 5-year contract. <br /> <br />Struve stated he would be fine with the 5-year contract and that the type of work to be completed in those <br />five years would not be altered under the shorter contract. Struve indicated the City could re-evaluate the <br />situation after five years. <br /> <br />Printup moved, Levang seconded, to approve a 5-year Design-Build Maintenance Contract with <br />Short, Elliot, Hendrickson, and to direct Staff to enter into the negotiation process for the north <br />water tower repainting project. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.