Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 27, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 27 of 32  <br />  <br />(6. NORTH WATER TOWER REPAINTING PROJECT, Continued) <br /> <br />Struve stated in his view the $4,000 or $4,500 annually to do inspections is a very good value in order to <br />catch problems early on and that the City does not want to have a premature failure in year seven or eight. <br /> <br />Levang asked when the last time the tank was inspected previous to last year. <br /> <br />Struve stated to his understanding it has not been inspected previously. Struve indicated it may have been <br />inspected at year ten but that he has not found any formal reports to that effect. <br /> <br />Levang asked if they are surprised at the condition of it when they did inspect it. <br /> <br />Struve indicated he would defer to Jason on that. <br /> <br />Spragg stated the fact that they are just looking at an overcoat after 21 years is surprising and that they <br />were expecting the tank would have required reblasting and coating. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the tank has ever been power washed. <br /> <br />Struve stated he is not aware of it happening but that he has not specifically asked Staff that question. <br /> <br />Spragg stated the American Water Works Association recommends a five-year inspection window. <br /> <br />Levang noted Point 3 of Bolton & Menk’s letter states that a three-coat epoxy system is commonly <br />provided in the design-bid-build industry as well as a zinc primer. Levang asked if what they are <br />proposing is different. <br /> <br />Spragg stated they are proposing a two-coat system and that three coats in their opinion would be overkill. <br /> <br />Spragg stated if they were dealing with a tank that was being blasted down to bare steel, he would likely <br />recommend three coats, but that they are not doing that in this case. <br /> <br />Printup indicated he is not in favor of the logo. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she would prefer it only be on one side. <br /> <br />Levang stated she would also rather not do the logo. <br /> <br />Struve stated the proposal is for block lettering similar to what is currently on there and that the additional <br />$4,800 was to put the city logo on both sides rather than the block lettering. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the City is required to go with the lowest bid when they go out for bids. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the City must enter into the low bid system for work to be performed except for <br />engineering and professional services. Mattick stated the bidding process could require mandatory <br />qualifications, which would eliminate some bidders. <br />McMillan asked if Mr. Struve is recommending a five or ten-year warranty. <br />