Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 27, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 18 of 32  <br />  <br />(5. #13-3637 WILLI ABBOTT ON BEHALF OF THE BROADWAY GROUP, LLC – 2350 <br />WATERTOWN ROAD AND XXX WILLOW DRIVE NORTH – PRELIMINARY PLAT AND RPUD <br />REZONING, Continued) <br /> <br />Abbott stated if that is the case, the properties that are around there with public roads would pay the same <br />amount of taxes as the residents on the private roads. Abbott stated he is attempting to create affordable <br />housing, and if these property owners are required to maintain a private road, it would create an added <br />expense to the homeowners. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated Hennepin County, for the last 35 years, has been hit or miss on how they interpret the <br />underlying road easements the City has for the rural private roads. Some show up as an outlot and some <br />show up as a private road. Gaffron indicated he has attempted in the past to get that clarified but it has <br />not yet happened. <br /> <br />Abbott stated in speaking with Staff, it seemed that Staff wanted to go down the path of a public road. If <br />the road is private, Abbott indicated some items will need to be changed. Abbott stated under their plan, <br />they did what they heard Staff suggest and that in his view the public road makes the most sense. Abbott <br />stated the added taxes the City would receive would outweigh the maintenance costs. <br /> <br />Levang stated the City Council has expressed its opinions on the application and that the decision is up to <br />the City Council. <br /> <br />Abbott asked who would monitor the use of the 10 percent recreation area. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the neighborhood would monitor it. Another RPUD in the City includes Stone Bay, which <br />has some areas designated for a neighborhood park. Gaffron stated when you look at Glendale Cove, the <br />City Council concluded that the public trail that connects from Glendale Drive across the church property <br />and becomes part of Glendale Cove Lane, is their private recreation area. Gaffron indicated there is a <br />little outlot to the north as you enter the road that was also attributed to the private recreation area. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated for a development of half a dozen homes, the idea of having 10 percent of the site <br />dedicated to a neighborhood recreation area, especially when it is across the street from a city park, did <br />not make much sense. <br /> <br />McMillan stated that requirement was designed for bigger developments. <br /> <br />Abbott indicated he is not in favor of doing it. <br /> <br />Levang noted the City Council is in agreement with that point. <br /> <br />Abbott stated the only other discussion is the decision on the FAR. <br /> <br />John Quinlan, Gordan James Construction, stated a comment was made that this development resembles <br />Glendale Cove. Quinlan noted the largest lot in Glendale Cover is just under a half acre and the smallest <br />lot in this development is over a half acre. If you average the lot sizes, these lots are much bigger than <br />Glendale Cover as a whole and will not have the same feel. <br />