Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 27, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 17 of 32  <br />  <br />(5. #13-3637 WILLI ABBOTT ON BEHALF OF THE BROADWAY GROUP, LLC – 2350 <br />WATERTOWN ROAD AND XXX WILLOW DRIVE NORTH – PRELIMINARY PLAT AND RPUD <br />REZONING, Continued) <br /> <br />Levang stated she likes the planting buffer along the cul-de-sac and that in her opinion it should be put in <br />place to reduce the visual impacts. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the question becomes whether a buffer like that can be accomplished without moving the <br />road. Gaffron stated if that area is preserved for a future road, it could also contain plantings in the <br />interim. <br /> <br />Levang stated she would like to see plantings in the cul-de-sac portion. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the landscaping plan is very good as it relates to the selection of plant material and that <br />the swales will be easier to maintain than rain gardens. <br /> <br />Willi Abbott, Applicant, stated by increasing the road setback, the buildable area on the lot would be <br />reduced to 40 feet for the width of a home, which would result in a long, thin home. Abbott stated what <br />they have created with this neighborhood is wider lots and that he understands the development is on a <br />collector street. Abbott stated they chose to use the RPUD standards for this development, which is a <br />give and take. The concept on the interior of the development was created in a layout that works and is <br />visually consistent and very appealing. Abbott noted this concept started way back last year and that if <br />the setback is increased to 40 feet, it will kill the project because it will result in a lot of garage with a <br />little bit of home visible from the front. Abbott indicated he would have to come back with a whole new <br />plan and that he does not support that decision. Abbott stated part of what they are building is homes that <br />have a connection to the front street and a sense of community. As it relates to the wetland outlot, Abbott <br />stated he does not totally understand why that needs to be carved out of a landowner’s land. Abbott stated <br />the wetland easement concept that has been around for a long time works very well. Cutting it out as a <br />separate piece, whether it is owned by a homeowners association or the private homeowner, would result <br />in small lots and that they are attempting to create larger lots with smaller homes. <br /> <br />Abbott stated that would necessitate them having to go back to the 15 percent lot coverage area concept, <br />which would not apply to this. The part that applies would be 50 percent FAR on a RPUD. Abbott stated <br />what they were trying to come up with was a plan that would meet the lot coverage for single family in an <br />RPUD and if they are now looking at 15 percent, that will result in a little house. <br /> <br />Abbott stated the next issue is the private road. Abbott asked if a public road is required on an urban <br />neighborhood under the City’s Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated that is the City’s Comprehensive Plan policy. <br /> <br />Abbott noted the policy would then be changed. <br /> <br />Levang pointed out the Comprehensive Plan is a guide. <br /> <br /> <br />