Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 27, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 11 of 32  <br />  <br />(5. #13-3637 WILLI ABBOTT ON BEHALF OF THE BROADWAY GROUP, LLC – 2350 <br />WATERTOWN ROAD AND XXX WILLOW DRIVE NORTH – PRELIMINARY PLAT AND RPUD <br />REZONING, Continued) <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated one option for consolidating documents may be for the developer to establish the <br />easements and restrictions within neighborhood covenants. The downside to this is that they may get <br />‘buried’ and are not as readily discernible to a buyer as separate documents. When incorporated into <br />neighborhood covenants, there must be language that makes them permanently applicable and not able to <br />be changed without City approval. Under the current plan layout, the individual easement documents <br />have to be filed in the title of each affected lot. If the wetlands and preservation areas were in an outlot <br />owned by a homeowners association, the complexity created by multiple documents would decrease. If <br />the wetlands and preservation areas were in an outlot owned by a homeowners association, the <br />complexity created by multiple documents would decrease. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the simplest option might be for the wetland and tree preservation areas to be platted as a <br />single outlot to be owned by the City, in which case certain easements would not be required. However, <br />that would be a distinct departure from past City practice. The City’s philosophy has been for decades <br />that the City does not want to own wetlands or little snippets of conservation areas scattered around the <br />City. The wetland easement prohibits the developer and property owners from doing damage to the <br />wetland, while the drainage easement allows the City to maintain drainage through it. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted staff does not have a firm recommendation for consolidating the various easement <br />documents that will or may be required of this plat. Staff is willing to entertain a proposal by the <br />developer’s attorney to incorporate certain of the required elements into a neighborhood covenant, which <br />has been done with some past developments in Orono. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted one of the neighbors, Mr. Kelley, has submitted a letter dated January 10, 2014, in which <br />he suggests three specific actions he feels would make for a better development. In addition to the <br />applicant’s response, Staff would make the following observations: <br /> <br />1. “Increase setback from Willow Drive.” As noted in prior memos, the standard for RPUD is a <br /> 50-foot side street setback from Willow Drive. The applicant is proposing 25 feet. Kelley has <br /> suggested 40 feet. Increasing the setback to something greater than 25 feet will reduce the <br /> flexibility in house design while potentially allowing for better screening, especially if a trail is <br /> someday developed on the east side of Willow Drive. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted of the Council Members asked what the existing setbacks are from Willow Drive. Gaffron <br />indicated the houses across the street in the Hackberry neighborhood are approximately 50 feet from the <br />street lot line. The one house that is furthest from the park is 30 feet. On the corner lot of Glendale Cove, <br />due to wetlands and drainage easements, that house is 45 to 50 feet from the street right-of-way. Gaffron <br />indicated the setbacks vary in depth and the question is whether 50 feet would be appropriate in this <br />situation. <br /> <br />McMillan noted Willow has a distinct setback look. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted the City is not creating a neighborhood of two acre lots with Oliver Hill and that they are <br />instead creating an urbanized neighborhood.