Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 27, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 10 of 32  <br />  <br />(5. #13-3637 WILLI ABBOTT ON BEHALF OF THE BROADWAY GROUP, LLC – 2350 <br />WATERTOWN ROAD AND XXX WILLOW DRIVE NORTH – PRELIMINARY PLAT AND RPUD <br />REZONING, Continued) <br /> <br />Gaffron noted based on the total lot areas, use of the RPUD standard 0.50 floor area ratio yields allowable <br />floor areas ranging from 8,700 square feet to 19,000 square feet. Use of the 0.50 floor area ratio for the <br />development would potentially allow much larger homes than the developer anticipates. Staff does not <br />recommend use of the 0.50 floor area ratio standard. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted the average size of the house would be 4,100 square feet. The two smallest lots in Block 2 <br />located on the south side of the road are the most able to accommodate the large rambler footprint since <br />they are the least constrained by setbacks, wetlands, and buffers, but they would have the most difficulty <br />meeting a 15 percent footprint limit. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated he has laid out a number of options for the City Council to consider for the lot coverage <br />limit and those are contained on Page 3 of Staff’s report. Each one of them has impacts varying by the <br />size of the lot. The applicant’s preference is to establish the limit as the larger of 3,820 square feet or 15 <br />percent. Under this scenario, house footprint limits would range from 3,820 to 5,700 square feet. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted the proposed grading for the site is to grade virtually the entire site south of the wetland <br />and southwest of the tree line adjacent to the creek. The applicant has indicated future buffering will <br />likely be new plantings or possibly transplants of existing, higher quality materials from the site. The <br />applicant is also proposing additional screening along Willow Drive and buffering to adjacent properties. <br /> <br />The applicant Mr. Abbott has revised the rain garden locations to be completely within each individual lot <br />and not straddling lot lines. The rain gardens would be protected via an expansion of the perimeter <br />drainage and utility easements. Gaffron noted the new landscaping plan suggests elimination of rain <br />gardens in favor of shallow swales, which would be a conflict between the new landscaping plan and the <br />new grading plan. <br /> <br />Staff has reviewed the various easements and covenants that would be required and considered the <br />possibilities for consolidating them into a more compact format. Gaffron stated the following easements <br />would be required: perimeter drainage and utility easements; other drainage and utility easements <br />devoted to stormwater facilities, ponds, rain gardens, and non-wetland drainageways; wetland flowage <br />and conservation easements; a trail easement; city sewer easement; tree preservation easement, and a <br />wetland buffer. Gaffron indicated the MCWD is requiring a 16-foot buffer bordering the wetland. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted if the road is to be private, it would be platted as an outlot over which the City historically <br />has required an underlying road, drainage and utility easement as well as a covenant establishing that the <br />neighborhood has maintenance obligations for the road. In the case of Oliver Hill, the road is proposed to <br />be platted as a public road, which automatically places the ownership and maintenance responsibilities on <br />the City and no easements are required. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />