Laserfiche WebLink
> <br /> ` MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Tuesday,November 12,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (7. #I3-3631 LANDSOURCE,LLC(TODD HOLMERS),3700 NORTHERNAVENUE, <br /> SUBDIVISION—PRELIMINARYPLAT—PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, <br /> Continued) <br /> 4. Approval should be subject to the standard platting requirements including park dedication, <br /> stormwater trunk fees, granting of appropriate easements, etc.,to be defined and enumerated <br /> in a resolution for preliminary plat approval. <br /> 5. Council should advise Staff and applicant of any concerns regarding any aspects of the proposal <br /> that needs to be further addressed. <br /> Bremer noted the Planning Commission's preference was Option 1 and asked whether that was in part <br /> directed by the applicant. <br /> Gaffron stated that would be a fair statement. <br /> McMillan asked how many lots could be developed if it was constructed to code. <br /> Gaffron stated in his opinion, if all the codes were complied with, it would likely result in five lots and it <br /> would go back to the proposal that has the back lots where they would need to have one and a half acres. <br /> Two of the other lots would have half an acre of dry buildable and one lot would have less than that. <br /> Gaffron indicated the wetland in the center of the property makes it difficult to do a standard plat and the <br /> applicant is pretty much tied to using the existing road and utilities. <br /> McMillan stated in her view it sounds like four would fit in more comfortably than five. <br /> Gaffron stated it would be difficult to get five lots without having back lots. <br /> Printup asked if outlots are taxed. <br /> Gaffron stated typically the assessor will take the value of the common area and split it among each of the <br /> building sites. <br /> Levang asked if the outlots would be managed by a homeowners association. <br /> Gaffron indicated they would be and that the City would need to ensure that any common areas receive <br /> the appropriate classification. <br /> Levang asked what would happen if the outlot is removed from the calculation and the Council requires <br /> half-acre lots that are 100 feet in width. <br /> Gaffron noted Page 2 of the October 17 memo shows the lot acreages. Gaffron stated the total dry <br /> buildable land would be just over two acres of dry land,within the outlot there would be two acres, and <br /> the remaining would be wetland. <br /> Levang stated per the eacisting zoning, 100-foot wide lots and one-half acre dry contiguous land would be <br /> required. <br /> Page 5 of 36 <br />