Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> � ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Tuesday,June 10,2013 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (7. #13-3606 CHERYL CORYEA &RICHARD DEVLIN, 3085 CASCO POINT ROAD, <br /> VARIANCES—RESOL UTION NO. 6300, Continued) <br /> McMillan asked if the applicant would be okay with coming back in two weeks with a more detailed plan. <br /> Devlin indicated he is not opposed to that. <br /> Printup moved,Levang seconded,to table Application#13-3603,Cheryl Coryea and Richard <br /> Devlin,3085 Casco Point Road. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> 8. #13-3605 BRIAN AND REBECCA HENNING,245 TONKA AVENUE,VARIANCES— <br /> PUBLIC HEARING <br /> Brian and Rebecca Henning,Applicants,were present. <br /> Curtis stated the home on the property was allowed to be constructed 30 feet from the rear property lie <br /> with a variance granted in 1994. Currently the applicants,who are the new property owners, are <br /> requesting a setback variance in order to construct a 14' x 14' deck, plus stair, from an upper level <br /> doorway on the south side of the home 30 feet from the rear lot line where a 50-foot setback is required. <br /> A 30-foot setback currently exists for the home. A minimal landing and stair were approved in 2012 in <br /> this location for egress by the building official. <br /> During Staff's review for the setback variance for the deck, Staff noted an 83 square foot shed located <br /> between the home and the street, 19.6 feet from the front lot line. This shed was constructed by a <br /> previous property owner and not the applicants. No permits exist for this shed and it exists in an illegal <br /> location. The applicants are requesting after-the-fact approval to allow the shed to remain in its current <br /> location. As this after-the-fact review was not initially part of the applicants' request,the City Council <br /> will need to hold a public hearing regarding this matter. <br /> The Planning Commission at its May meeting voted 6 to 0 to recommend approval of the setback <br /> variances to allow the deck. The Planning Commission also discussed the shed in question and how to <br /> address the illegal location. After discussion,the Planning Commission recommended that Staff should <br /> publish for a public hearing for the June 10 Council meeting so the Council could review and either <br /> approve the shed as an after-the-fact variance or deny the shed. <br /> Staff recommends approval of the setback variance to allow a 14' x 14' deck to be constructed with stairs <br /> 30 feet from the rear property line. Further, Staff recommends the Council open the public hearing for the <br /> after-the-fact variance for the shed location and receive any additional public testimony regarding the <br /> variance. Staff finds that the location of the shed does not appear to alter the character of the <br /> neighborhood or adversely impact adjacent properties. It may be reasonable to consider approving the <br /> location as it exists today. The Council should consider requiring the applicants to apply for an after-the- <br /> fact permit formalizing the shed location. Staff would recommend waiving the after-the-fact fee for the <br /> permit since it was constructed prior to the applicants purchasing the property. <br /> McMillan asked if anyone on the City Council has any issue with the deck. <br /> Levang indicated she visited the property today and that she does not have a problem with the deck. <br /> Page 9 of 32 <br />