My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/26/2012 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
11/26/2012 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2015 3:16:09 PM
Creation date
2/19/2015 3:16:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,November 26,2012 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT <br /> 6. NAVARRE STREET LIGHT UPDATE <br /> Struve noted back in May of 2012, a street light in Spring Park fell into the roadway. This was the second <br /> pole to fail due to poor conditions in the last couple of years. Spring Park hired Barr Engineering to <br /> analyze the condition of the poles and wiring in Spring Park. <br /> The 38 light poles in Navarre were installed in 1988,at the same time as the poles in Spring Park. They <br /> are also constructed from the same materials and show similar corrosion issues as the poles in Spring <br /> Park. At this time no poles have fallen in Orono. Spring Park has asked if Orono would want to pursue a <br /> joint project. By doubling the number of poles and using the same contractor, it may reduce the cost to <br /> each city. Because the number of light poles is the same in each community,the costs outlined by Barr's <br /> memo are reflective of the costs to replace the light poles and wires in Orono. <br /> The same company utilized by Spring Park has analyzed Navarre's lighting system to see if a shorter <br /> decorative pole will provide adequate lighting. The lower decorative lighting will meet the MN/DOT <br /> recommendations for this road classification. <br /> Struve requested the City Council discuss the options presented and to indicate which options are <br /> representative of what the Council would like to see in Navarre. If the options are acceptable, Struve <br /> indicated he would like to do a mock-up and cost analysis of each option and bring it back to the City <br /> Council in January. <br /> Struve noted Spring Park will be moving forward with their project in 2013. In order to meet their <br /> schedule and to get the project bid out in March or April, the City Council should authorize the <br /> development of plans and specifications and finalize the pole and fixture to be used by the end of January, <br /> 2013. <br /> Rahn stated if these are the options available, in his opinion the Bemidji and the Fairfax are too ornate and <br /> that he prefers Option No.4. <br /> Printup asked if this material will corrode at some point in the future. <br /> Struve stated the existing poles were installed in 1988 and are approximately 25 years old. Struve <br /> indicated these poles axe constructed out of stainless steel as well as the anchors and will not be subject to <br /> the corrosion the existing poles are experiencing. <br /> Franchot suggested the Publics Work Department periodically inspect the poles. <br /> Struve indicated they did conduct an inspection of the poles this year and that an inspection process will <br /> be implemented for the future. <br /> McMillan asked how high the poles are in Mound. <br /> Struve stated he will have to obtain that information for the Council. <br /> McMillan noted the major expense associated with this project is the wiring. <br /> -- — —�___��___._.__ .._.__. --- �- -_- Page 4 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.