Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE " <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, September 10,2012 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (l2. CONTRACT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES, Continued) <br /> organizational chart. Rahn asked if there is a reason they ran the surveys without the number of <br /> employees. <br /> Farniok stated there were several options available for the survey and that he elected to put in a number <br /> for the population but he did not put in the number of officers. Farniok stated he cannot remember what <br /> the options were to choose from and whether there was something that was close to what Orono has. <br /> Farniok stated a lot of the surveys use population size and community size and that he used the combined <br /> populations of Orono and Mound. <br /> Rahn asked how the Police Depariment is dealing with the possible temporary status of some of these <br /> positions. Rahn stated 10 years from now when the contract ends there will likely be some issues to deal <br /> with and that there needs to be some due diligence done tonight. Rahn asked what would happen if one <br /> of Orono's sergeants moves to the deputy chief position and in ten years the contract is not renewed. <br /> Loftus noted there is a three year notice provision in the contract and a mutually punishing provision that <br /> requires Mound to pay half of any unemployment or termination costs if the contract is terminated. <br /> Loftus indicated that should help with the planning into the future. <br /> Rahn commented that helps somewhat but that there should be some language that the position could only <br /> be a 10-year position. <br /> Bremer stated that is true with any position. Orono has two other contract cities currently and those <br /> issues could arise with those contracts. Overall staffing goes up when your contracts go up and staffing <br /> goes down when the contracts go down. <br /> Rahn stated as it concerns the officers, if the contract is not renewed ten years from now,would it become <br /> an issue for the union of who would be terminated. <br /> Farniok stated it would depend on seniority and that to his recollection the deputy chief individual would <br /> move down to a lower position and the least senior person would be let go. <br /> Mattick stated they have worked out a memorandum of understanding with LELS that says that in the <br /> event of a layoff,they will start with anyone hired after the effective date of the contract, second would be <br /> any Mound officers,and third would be existing Orono officers. <br /> Rahn stated he has a concern that if the contract is not renewed,the Police Deparhnent is required to keep <br /> the deputy chief position. <br /> Mattick noted the City is not bound contractually with that position and that the City has the right to <br /> restructure the department. <br /> Farniok stated they would restructure the organizational chart when given a three-year notice and that the <br /> positions would be eliminated once the contract expires. <br /> Franchot commented he is very comfortable with the due diligence that has been done and that the <br /> contract is sri-uctured well. Franchot stated his only question related to understanding why a deputy chief <br /> Page 16 of 26 <br />