My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-13-2012 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
08-13-2012 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2015 2:27:44 PM
Creation date
2/19/2015 2:26:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />Monday, August 13, 2012 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(S. #10-3491 CITY OF ORONO - HARDCOVER REGULATIONS AMENDMENT, Continued) <br />are a few properties that appear to be right on the lake but are not included in Tier 1 at the present time. <br />That is basically because the areas either have a small stretch of land, a road, or some other feature <br />between that lot and the actual OHW. Those particular areas will be addressed in Step 2 of the analysis. <br />Step two of the process identifies the primary building area on the lot. The primary building area is <br />identified by either the principal structure or existing structure on the lot as well as the setbacks of <br />adjacent structures if you are looking at a vacant parcel. If the primary building area is completely within <br />the 250 -foot buffer around a lake, then the parcel, under Step 2, would also be placed into Tier 1. <br />The next part of Step 2 deals with properties whose primary building areas are divided by the 250 -foot <br />buffer. In those cases, if the adjacent properties have already been placed into Protection Tier 1, then <br />those parcels would also be placed into Tier 1. If the adjacent properties have not been assigned into a <br />protection tier, further analysis would be done. Gozola stated they then identified the primary building <br />areas on each of the lots. If you overlay the 250 -foot buffer on to the map, you can see that three of these <br />building areas are divided by that particular zone. Since all of these parcels are adjacent to Tier 1 <br />properties, they would also be assigned to Tier 1. The parcel that has its primary building area outside of <br />the 250 -foot buffer would be examined in subsequent steps. The end result of that analysis shows the <br />changes in the map. <br />Step 3 continues to focus on the primary building area and its distance from the OHWL on the parcels <br />that have yet to be assigned to a protection tier. If any portion of the primary building area is within 300 <br />feet of a protected stream or if it is touching the landward extent of a floodplain from a stream, then it is <br />placed into Tier 2. Likewise, if a portion of a primary building area is between the distance of 250 feet <br />and 500 feet from protected lakeshore, the property is also placed into Tier 2. Finally, parcels, with a <br />primary building area beyond 500 feet from lakes but up to 1,000 feet are placed into Tier 3. All of the <br />remaining unassigned parcels would again be continued to be examined under the subsequent steps. <br />Gozola stated as an example, the property that is bisected by the 500 -foot divider and has a portion of its <br />primary building area within that 250 -to 500 foot zone would be assigned to Tier 2. Because the other <br />homes are outside of the 500 -foot buffer, those would be assigned to Tier 3. <br />Step 4 continues to examine unassigned parcels by looking at the zoning districts for each of those <br />parcels. If the zoning on the parcel happens to be RPUD, then it is placed into Protection Tier 4. <br />Industrial is placed into Protection Tier 5. Unassigned parcels continue to be examined. <br />The final analysis step is designed to fill in gaps within the system. Essentially it includes areas that are <br />surrounded by already regulated parcels that by chance are not being regulated but should be regulated <br />given that they have as much impact on the water quality of the area as the surrounding parcels. Gozola <br />stated there is no magic number to define what the gap is so Staff determined that a reasonable gap would <br />be 20 acres. Gozola indicated under Step 5 he first looked at those parcels individually. If more than half <br />of the parcel's border was being regulated by one or more of the protection tiers, then that parcel was <br />assigned to the tier which abutted it by the greatest percentage. The next step was to look for gaps of 20 <br />acres or less and those were analyzed similar to the other individual parcels. If more than half of the gap's <br />overall border was being regulated by one of the protection tiers, then the entire gap was assigned to the <br />tier which abutted it by the greatest percentage. Parcels that were still unassigned following Step 5 were <br />deemed to be exempt from the stormwater quality overlay district. <br />Page 4 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.