My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-13-2012 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
08-13-2012 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2015 2:27:44 PM
Creation date
2/19/2015 2:26:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />Monday, August 13, 2012 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(PUBLIC COMMENTS, Continued) <br />they are looking to have a strong showing from the Navarre community to show that they are very <br />interested in pedestrian safety <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT <br />5. #10-3491 CITY OF ORONO - HARDCOVER REGULATIONS AMENDMENT <br />Ben Gozola addressed the City Council regarding the proposed new hardcover ordinance. The draft <br />ordinance has been revised in response to the recommendations made by the City Council at its June 26th <br />meeting. The changes include the elimination of the proposed definition for building coverage to remove <br />any possible conflicts with the City's historic term of lot coverage. In addition, swimming pools have <br />been specifically listed as hardcover within the definitions; hardcover exclusions that had been listed <br />within the definition and drew a lot of discussion at the meeting have now been moved out of the <br />definition and have been placed directly in the code in the hardcover exclusions section; and the sections <br />on hardcover encroachments have been clarified to explain how those encroachments would be <br />calculated. <br />Gozola referred to a presentation slide to illustrate how two equally sized lots of 10,000 square feet would <br />be dealt with to calculate hardcover. Lot A has a 1,000 square foot house and Lot B has an identical <br />home but also a shed that encroaches into Lot A's property. When the owner of Lot A comes forward <br />and requests a permit, the hardcover will be based on the gross acreage of that lot and there would be no <br />penalty to that landowner for the neighbor's encroaching hardcover. Comparatively, for Lot B, the <br />allowed hardcover would be based on the gross acreage of Lot B, but in this particular case, the hardcover <br />would be based on both the house and the shed as well as the encroaching portion of the shed onto the <br />neighboring property. Under either scenario, Staff would not make any adjustments to the lot area based <br />on the encroaching hardcover. <br />Another change made in the language is that spacing between deck boards is now going to be required in <br />order to be eligible for the 100 square foot credit. <br />Retaining walls under the revised ordinance have been split into two categories. The first category is the <br />group of walls that are deemed necessary by the City Engineer to control erosion as well as other <br />necessary functions. Those retaining walls would be exempt from the hardcover calculation. The second <br />grouping of retaining walls that are built for aesthetic purposes would be counted as hardcover. <br />A specific set of criteria was also devised to determine which parcels within the City would fall within the <br />Stormwater Quality Overlay District and which parcels would be exempt. Gozola indicated he actually <br />built that framework directly into the ordinance so it could be used as subdivisions occur. The next <br />update was the creation of a new map based on the new process to assign stormwater tiers. Gozola stated <br />in his opinion, due to that update, the overlay map is better because of it, and referred to the next slide to <br />illustrate how the map has evolved. <br />Gozola stated he basically started with a blank slate for the entire City of Orono and then analyzed the <br />entire city under Step 1, which identifies all of the parcels that abut a protected lakeshore or stream. All <br />such parcels are the most critical to protect and they need to be in the Protection Tier 1, which is the most <br />restrictive tier. The end result is the map before the City Council tonight. As you look at the map, there <br />Page 3 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.