Laserfiche WebLink
' � FILE#13-3600 <br /> 2 April 2013 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> Setbacks: <br /> LR-1B Required Proposed <br /> Rear 30' +200' <br /> Southwest Side 10' 10' <br /> Northeast Side 10' 10' <br /> Lakeshore 75' 75' <br /> Portions of the proposed home will encroach up to 30' into <br /> Average Lakeshore the average lakeshore setback. <br /> Structural Coverage: <br /> Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br /> 51,650 s.f. (1.18 acre) Allowed: 7,747.5 s.f. (15%) <br /> Proposed: 3,808 s.f. (7%) <br /> Hardcover Calculations: <br /> Stormwater Total Area Allowed Existing Proposed <br /> Overlay District �n Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover <br /> Tier <br /> approx 905 ! 10,017 40 s.f. <br /> 12,912 s.f. 9,404 s.f. 1 <br /> Tier 1 51,650 s.f. �25 0�0) (18.2%) s.f. w/in � s.f. w/in � <br /> 75'zone (19.4%) 75' zone � <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> Average Lakeshore Setback Variance <br /> The existing home on the property is nonconforming with respect to the lake setback and the <br /> average lakeshore setback. Approximately 525 square feet of the existing home is located <br /> ahead of the 75 foot setback line; the existing deck is entirely within the 75 foot setback. The <br /> applicant is proposing to fully conform to the 75-foot setback requirement with the proposed <br /> home. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow the new home to encroach up to 30 feet <br /> into the average lakeshore setback on the northeast side. The home to the northeast is located <br /> approximate�y 180 feet from the lake where the adjacent neighbor to the southwest is between <br /> 70-80 feet from the lake resulting in an average lakeshore setback line at an approximate 45 <br /> degree angle across the subject property. The applicant is proposing to situate the home so that <br /> the encroachment is improved for the neighbor to the northeast however still ahead of the <br /> average lakeshore setback. <br /> Conditional Use Permit(CUP) Review <br /> The existing home on the property extends into the 75-foot lake setback area. The demolition <br /> of the home does not necessarily result in the need for a CUP. However as the applicant is <br /> proposing to construct the new home right at the 75-foot setback grading within the setback is <br /> shown. The City's Engineer Jesse Struve has reviewed the applicant's grading plan for the <br /> purpose of the land use application and did not identify significant concerns. Struve's <br /> comments are attached as Exhibit H and also note that there is an unctassified wetland shown <br /> on the properly near the road. The applicant should work with the MCWD and delineate the <br /> wetland if deemed necessary. The final grading plan will be reviewed at the time of building <br />