My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-25-1996 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
11-25-1996 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2012 4:22:34 PM
Creation date
12/28/2012 4:22:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 25, 1996 <br />• ( #1B - County Road 15 Orono Lane to Wayzata Border - Continued) <br />Goetten indicated when the plan was originally reviewed, the clear zone was discussed <br />and a variance secured. She asked why this was not required here. Polaczyk noted there <br />were two types of clear zones, one being rural and one suburban. A 20' zone is required <br />in the suburban where berms, curb, and gutter are required. In the rural as is the case in <br />this particular area, a 30' clear zone is required. The suburban zone is applied elsewhere <br />on this roadway. Goetten stated that it had originally been indicated the trees would be <br />lost due to the wetlands and questioned what the benefit was. <br />Kelley asked if the roadway was being moved at this location to the north. Guy Nolan of <br />the design team said it would move 5 meters (about 15') from the edge of the bituminous <br />to the other edge. Polaczyk indicated this movement would also reduce the impact on <br />the properties on the south side. <br />Goetten said she was disturbed, after having asked for this design several times, to be <br />seeing it for the first time at this meeting. Goetten felt it would be imprudent to make a <br />decision without reviewing the actual design. Jabbour suggested hearing the information <br />presented and tabling any decision to the next Council meeting. Polaczyk reiterated the <br />movement of the road was due to the recommendation of the geotechnical consultant. <br />Kelley asked if the movement of the road to the north was a result of the poor soils. <br />• Polaczyk said this was a partial reason. Kelley asked how deep these materials are <br />located. Nolan said the depth is 2 meters on the north to 3 -1/2 meters on the south, <br />which is 6' to 10 -12'. Kelley asked if the materials would be excavated. Polaczyk said <br />the materials would be floated and then surcharged. Surcharging is adding a fabric <br />material and weighting it down which compresses the soils. Then after a time duration, <br />the surcharge is removed and the road is built to proposed elevations. <br />• <br />Nolan indicated the time length for the surcharge to be about 6 months. It would be <br />completed in two stages. Two lanes of traffic would be moved to the south by using the <br />existing shoulder and one lane during the time the north side is being surcharged. This <br />would allow the roadway to remain open. <br />Goetten said it was her understanding that the roadway would move 12' to the north. <br />Then the distance changed to 20'. Polaczyk said the amount is now 16'. Nolan explained <br />that the alignment is shifted 10' to the north and the left turn lane shifts it slightly more. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.