Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 25, 1996 <br />• ( #8 - Lafayette Ridge Tax Forfeit Property - Continued) <br />Kelley suggested acquiring the property. Callahan asked if there was any public use. <br />Hurr questioned whether the property could be counted twice regarding wetland <br />mitigation while Moorse questioned whether it can be used for mitigation. Mabusth said <br />it could not as it is already wetland. Gaffron noted there is a conservation easement over <br />it now and only the perimeter is dry. Jabbour indicated that the five parcels using the <br />property as a density credit would become non - conforming if the City were to acquire the <br />land. He also noted the use by the community for drainage and the need to maintain it if <br />it is acquired_ Kelley questioned whether the City would assess the residents for the <br />maintenance. Callahan indicated the easement allows the City to have the right to drain <br />into it. Jabbour said he sees no reason to acquire the property. Kelley noted a case could <br />be made for the health and welfare of the City and its responsibility if a problem were to <br />arise. <br />Kelley questioned who should have been assessed for the outlot. Callahan indicated <br />those who benefit should be assessed. Hurr was informed commercial assessment was at <br />$12.00 a lineal foot for the street light project. <br />Kelley suggested giving the parcel back to the association and abating the assessment. <br />Hurr supported that suggestion. <br />• Goetten said she supports giving the parcel back but not necessarily to abating the <br />assessment. She noted that people are still responsible regardless of notification. <br />• <br />Callahan inquired what method would be used to give the parcel back. Moorse <br />suggested the cancellation option. He noted there may be additional costs involved. This <br />method would avoid using the HRA and avoids the need to sell it to the adjoining <br />landowners. Callahan noted it also postpones the question of how much needs to be <br />collected. Jabbour and Hurr said they would like a decision to be made on the <br />assessment at this time. <br />Bruce Palmer, President of the Lafayette Ridge Homeowners Association, asked where <br />the street lights were located and was informed of their location. He is of the opinion <br />that it is inappropriate to assess swamp land. He did indicate that the property tax <br />statements were now reaching the correct parties. He questioned the benefit to the <br />homeowners when the lights are located on a County road several blocks away. Callahan <br />informed him the whole tax roll would otherwise be assessed. <br />Palmer said he spoke with Mr. Hoecherl at Hennepin County Tax Forfeit Department, <br />who informed him the County is favorable to the cancellation. Palmer requested the <br />assessment be abated. <br />13 <br />