Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 25, 1996 <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />#8 LAFAYETTE RIDGE TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY • <br />Gaffron reported the Lafayette Ridge Homeowners Association is requesting the City <br />release Outlot C to their association and waive the street light assessment made in 1990. <br />Outlot C is a wetland parcel that was designated to remain in the ownership of the <br />association as a density credit and as a benefit to five parcels. The outlot went into tax <br />forfeiture in 1994 as the developer never made the County aware of who should receive <br />the property tax statements. Because of the tax forfeiture, the association lost their right <br />to redeem the parcel last year. <br />Gaffron indicated there were three options available, and Staff is recommending the City <br />assist the association in regaining the parcel. The options include: 1) Release the <br />property for sale to adjacent landowners only, since it is unbuildable; 2) activate the City's <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority and have the HRA purchase the property for sale <br />to the LRHA; or 3) apply to the County for a cancellation of the forfeiture based on an <br />incorrect method of special assessment, i.e., assessment of an outlot rather than the <br />benefited homestead lots. <br />Another issue indicated by Gaffron for resolution is LRHA's request for waiving the <br />street light assessments, of which no portions have ever been paid. The Council's options <br />include: 1) Deny the waiver and require payment of past due amounts as a condition of <br />release of the property; 2) approve a partial waiver of the assessments; or 3) waive the • <br />entire assessment. <br />Callahan inquired about the amount of assessment. Gaffron noted the principal amount <br />to be about $2500 and $2800 -$2900 after accrued interest. Callahan asked what would <br />have happened if the assessment was not against Outlot C. Gaffron said it would have <br />been spread over the five homestead parcels. Hurr noted that those five parcels do not <br />abut Co Rd 15. Gaffron indicated the original assessment was $3.90 per front foot <br />charged to all abutting properties. <br />Callahan inquired since the assessment is to the City and alien is on the property, how is <br />it the County or State benefits by acquiring the property instead of the City since it is the <br />City's debt. Moorse explained that once the property goes tax forfeit, it becomes State <br />property and the City gains the right to acquire it if the City decides it needs the property. <br />Callahan asked if there were any restrictions if the property were acquired. Moorse <br />reported it would have to be for public use. Gaffron said the City has not had any <br />intention to acquire it. Callahan noted the Council has not studied it. He questioned the <br />County rule regarding the option of going through the HRA. <br />is <br />12 <br />