My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-1996 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
10-28-1996 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2012 4:20:28 PM
Creation date
12/28/2012 4:20:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 28, 1996 <br />• <br />(# 5. #2128 Orono Hockey Boosters, Inc. - Continued) <br />be considered and included with this application. Mabusth noted that the Met Council <br />has approved the MUSA line Comp Plan amendment on October 24, 1996 and in the <br />summer of '96 a joint engineering study confirmed that there is existing downstream <br />capacity to serve this facility. <br />Moorse noted the maintenance of the storm water facilities is a requirement that the <br />MCWD is placing on their permit. It calls for the city of Orono to monitor the <br />stormwater ponding. Hurr noted if the MCWD does not have resources to monitor the <br />maintenance of the ponding facilities why do they think the city has the resources? If we <br />have to hire an engineer to monitor does the Hockey Association pay for that cost? <br />Moorse stated that if this is the direction the MCWD is going in relation to other types <br />of development we would certainly want to look at that. <br />Callahan stated he was distressed when a public body exerts its authority over another <br />public body. If the Council decides to approve this, the Council should add to the <br />resolution that because of the public nature of the arena this agreement is not a precedent <br />to continue this requirement. <br />Engebretson stated he had the maintenance agreement which calls for monitoring every • <br />six months by the Hockey Association. Hurr noted it says by the city. Engebretson <br />noted the city will monitor their action and wants it to be as easy as possible. Hurr <br />stated the Ice Arena organization will maintain it and give the reports that are due every <br />six months to the city. Hurr stated there needs to be some kind of an agreement so we <br />know what the city is responsible for the monitoring. How can we require the applicant, <br />on their own, to maintain their pond? <br />Callahan moved, Kelley seconded to direct staff to return the MCWD agreement <br />regarding stormwater facility monitoring, with the understanding that the city approves <br />the agreement with the MCWD in which the city will undertake inspection of the <br />stormwater management facilities at the Ice Arena. But the Council's action is not an <br />acceptance of proposed policy regarding the MCWD's authority over the city regarding <br />this issue. Hurr requested the costs be borne by the applicant. Vote: Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />Callahan stated the Comp Plan was to include this area in the MUSA line and also the <br />hot spots. Hurr moved, Jabbour seconded to adopt Resolution #3791 Comprehensive <br />Plan A. Vote: Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />Engebretson stated the number of units needed by the ice arena will be determined by <br />the Metropolitan Waste Control but he is anticipating the need of 10 to 12 units. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.