Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 14, 1996 <br />• (Corridor Selection for Hwy 12 Upgrade - Continued) <br />In reviewing the Stubbs Bay to Old Crystal Bay Road portion, Mn/DOT plans to acquire <br />50' of additional right -of -way. The 50' additional would be south of the current railroad <br />right -of -way. There would be an additional 18 -1/2' depression of the railroad at Old <br />Crystal Bay Road. New Highway 12 will be 12 -13' lower than the railroad is currently <br />today. An additional 30' of right -of -way will be acquired east of Old Crystal Bay Road. <br />At Willow Drive, the proposed railroad grade will be lowered 15' with Highway 12 +/- 5' <br />above the proposed railroad grade. The result is the proposed highway will be 10' below <br />the current railroad grade. An additional 30 -50' of right -of -way will be acquired east of <br />Willow Drive through the City of Long Lake. The highway will be forced to swing away <br />from the railroad alignment at Watertown Road to avoid Green Glen Park located by the <br />Linda Wood neighborhood. This southern movement of 150 -200' is the largest change <br />anywhere on the proposed Alternative 6 plan. <br />O'Keefe said the grades of the highway have some flexibility where it ties into the railroad <br />grade to the east across the wetlands from the 7th green of Woodhill Golf Course to the <br />Fleming Addition in Long Lake by the old sewer plant. He noted the maps were keyed to <br />show the proposed right -of -way acquisition. <br />The meeting was then opened to questions. <br />• Wharton Sinkler, an Orono resident of French Lake Road, noted an earlier project had <br />inadequate funding and did not meet the metro plan. He asked if this proposal meets the <br />metro plan criteria. O'Keefe said the funding identified for the years 2001 -2003 is <br />sufficient to build what is being proposed. He said the Met Council is most supportive of <br />the plan. <br />Mary Bashore, 2565 Woodhaven Drive, Orono, asked why the 3 -lane proposal would <br />not work. O'Keefe said the reasons were 1) safety, 2) access, and 3)cost. He noted the <br />two projects are similar as to section types, but the accident rate is 2 -1/2 to 10 times that <br />of Alternative 6 equating to 70 accidents per year expectation. Of those 70 accidents, <br />one third are generally injury accidents, which equates to 23 or 24 injury accidents per <br />year. The access issue involved the road connections being only to higher designed roads <br />as in the trunk highway rather than to driveways, local streets, residences or businesses. <br />O'Keefe noted that accidents increase in direct correlation to the number of accesses on a <br />road. The cost of the 3 -lane proposal is lower at $30 million. The 2 -lane being proposed <br />is projected at $40 million. O'Keefe said the $30 million does not go far enough <br />compared to what will be gotten for the larger amount. He also noted the design criteria <br />as it relates to average peak hour speed should be 45 mph for a principle arterial road. <br />The 3 -lane would be assigned 35 mph with an observed speed up to 25 mph, which <br />would not allow it to work as designed. <br />• <br />