Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 14, 1996 <br />(Corridor Selection for Hwy 12 Upgrade - Continued) <br />O'Keefe noted there were three proposals last spring, one with a 2 -lane bypass south of <br />Long Lake and reconnection with the current Hwy 12 by Stubbs Bay Road. The second <br />proposal was the three component TSM proposal, which would have new interchanges at <br />Watertown and Ferndale. The third proposal was presented by neighborhood groups for <br />a three lane section on the existing alignment with a reversible east -west lane to be used <br />during rush hours and as a 2 -way left turn during off -peak times. These proposals were <br />evaluated during the summer months along with changes made to Mn/DOT's own <br />proposal. The interchange at Ferndale was eliminated as the benefit did not justify the <br />cost. The Watertown Road connection was also eliminated as the traffic has not <br />increased on that road as projected to show sufficent evidence to justify the cost. <br />O'Keefe said it was most noteworthy that the cost of tunneling under the Luce Line and <br />Burlington Northern Railroad would be very expensive and an engineering challenge. <br />The alternative of looking at moving the railroad tracks to the south with the road <br />located north of the tracks was reviewed. O'Keefe noted that Mn/DOT does not have <br />eminent domain rights over railroad property and would require agreement from the <br />Railroad. The Alternative 6 proposal provides the advantage of eliminating the Brown <br />Road, CoRd 6, and Stubbs Bay Rd. at -grade crossings, as well as two bridge trestles at <br />Watertown Road and May Street. O'Keefe said the railroad is in agreement to this point. <br />• <br />Mn/DOT is working with the railroad to move its current location 50 to 120' south of the • <br />current location, with the new Highway 12 located north of the relocated railroad tracks. <br />The advantages of this would be less expense than that of tunneling under the railroad, <br />and it allows bridging over the railroad at Brown Road. The grade of the railroad could <br />be lowered and would not impact the area south on Brown Road. There would be a <br />Lake Street connection with the new Brown Road slightly east of Virginia Avenue. By <br />lowering the grade, there would be less visual and noise impact especially to the west <br />where the railroad is depressed. <br />O'Keefe said Mn/DOT officials discussed this alternative with the Orono and Long Lake <br />Councils informally. The proposal was presented on September 17 with Mn/DOT <br />looking for the support of the Councils for the proposal as the identified preferred <br />corridor. The cities indicated general support. A public meeting was held at St. George's <br />on September 30 to review the Alternative 6 proposal. <br />O'Keefe reviewed the features of the proposal and the decision and what is and is not part <br />of the decision process made so far. The corridor selection sets the general alignment <br />only. The design details will be determined in the preliminary design phase. The design <br />phase will involve working with the cities with regard to details with decisions hopefully <br />made by October, 1997. The corridor is in a conceptual stage, especially where <br />interchanges, ramps and loops are concerned. <br />