My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-22-1996 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
04-22-1996 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2012 4:13:31 PM
Creation date
12/28/2012 4:13:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON APRIL 22, 1996 <br />( #3 - #2132 Orono Hockey Association - Continued) <br />• During public comments, Roger Zeeb 2905 6th Avenue North asked the <br />$ Council for the <br />reason for the variance. Callahan said the variance was to a moratorium for development <br />through out the area. The intent of the moratorium is to consider future development as <br />a whole but not for review of individual parcels of land that have been developed. The <br />variance for the application in question is being considered because there is no intent to <br />make changes to the comprehensive plan or zoning code for this property. The granting <br />of the variance to the moratorium allows the applicant to apply. <br />Zeeb asked if the large building on the small lot would have a bearing on approving the <br />variance. Callahan said the particulars have no relation to the moratorium on Hwy 12. <br />Changes to the zoning or ordinance for zoning would be considerations within the <br />moratorium. <br />Goetten clarified that the decision on the variance to the moratorium has no affect on the <br />actual review of the application. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Jabbour asked the Council to speak philosophically on whether they should review an <br />application, which is affected by the MUSA line application, before the MUSA line has <br />• been changed. <br />Mabusth informed the Council that the Met Council is considering separating the ice <br />arena project from the remainder of the MUSA application for expedited action. <br />Mabusth said the Met Council would not act on the school property until Orono and <br />Long Lake have resolved the downstream sewer capacity issue. <br />Jabbour noted that it would be beneficial for Staff to know the opinions of the City <br />Council regarding granting a conditional use permit subject to the MUSA line change <br />approval or delaying the application until the decision is known. <br />Callahan noted the Met Council application decision is of a political nature. He noted the <br />Council is in favor of the MUSA application including those units not within the school <br />property and those in the school property. <br />Cook asked the Council to understand that the sewer units to the ice arena and school <br />property as well as the property north of Long Lake all go through Long Lake. He noted <br />Long Lake is concerned regarding sufficient sewer capacity to serve the project. Cook <br />said the capacity is a valid concern. With a limited capacity, there may be a problem with <br />the number of units available to serve the ice arena. Cook said it may be necessary to <br />ration the units in relation to the proposed sewer projects in the north Long Lake area, <br />the ice arena, and any other projects that would affect the capacity of the sewer trunk <br />is system through Long Lake. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.