My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-22-1996 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
04-22-1996 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2012 4:13:31 PM
Creation date
12/28/2012 4:13:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON APRIL 22, 1996 <br />( #3) PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE TO MORATORIUM - #2132 ORONO • <br />HOCKEY ASSOCIATION, 1425 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH - <br />VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3718 - 7:10 -7:22 P.M. <br />Mabusth reported that the Orono Hockey Association has applied for a variance to the <br />moratorium as the moratorium prohibits the City from granting a conditional use permit <br />or building permit on property located within the Highway 12 corridor study area. The <br />proposal for the ice arena on the 4.4 acre parcel would require variance for setback for <br />the parking lot, variance to the number of parking stalls, and a variance for signage area. <br />Mabusth stated that the moratorium only applies to the granting of the building permit, <br />not in the application for a CUP. Mabusth asked the Council if they would consider <br />review of the conditional use permit at their May 13 meeting. <br />Callahan said he had no problem with the variance to the moratorium as the property <br />itself is not affected by the Highway 12 corridor. However, Callahan was not in favor of <br />viewing the conditional use permit itself Callahan asked to poll the Council members <br />regarding considering the application before the outcome of the MUSA line application <br />has been received. <br />Jabbour moved, Hurr seconded, to approve Resolution #3718 for the variance to the <br />moratorium based on the fact that it was not the intent of the moratorium to affect this <br />particular parcel of land. <br />Mabusth asked that the application fee be refunded excluding the cost of publication as • <br />was the case in the recent Meinhardt application. Callahan said the Meinhardt application <br />did not require any variance but that to the moratorium. Mabusth informed Hurr that the <br />future engineering costs, which will be incurred, would be recorded, and the refund <br />would be for any overage in the amount collected. <br />Barrett asked that the motion be based on a reason as listed on page 2 and 3 of the <br />moratorium ordinance by which a variance to the moratorium can be granted. Mabusth <br />said the reason for the variance is set forth as findings within the resolution. <br />Huff asked that the resolution exclude the term, "to permit," and change it to say, "to <br />consider the granting ". <br />Callahan asked that the statement, "the Planning Commission unanimously approved the <br />conditional use permit ", be removed from the resolution. <br />Jabbour amended his motion to include the above two listed changes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.