My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-2016 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
10-10-2016 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2016 3:22:20 PM
Creation date
11/18/2016 3:21:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 10, 2016 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />13. AGENDA TOPICS OR REQUESTS (continued) <br />Walsh stated he does not have a problem with the new business section but that he is wondering whether <br />there should be any limitations on it. Walsh stated he does not want to put any limitations on the minority <br />to have those votes if they feel it is necessary. <br />Loftus stated a new business section is not an uncommon thing on agendas but that the definition of <br />routine does not always fit when there is a split council. Loftus stated the Council can definitely talk <br />about it at a work session if that is what they would like to do and that she knows it has been a regular <br />discussion item from individual council members. <br />Mattick stated every city does it differently and that sometimes there is new business at the end where the <br />Council can vote or there is direction to have Staff put it on the agenda when they can. Mattick stated <br />how much feedback is needed from Staff or how much work is involved will impact the turnaround time. <br />Printup stated in his view it is a good start. <br />Loftus asked if the Council would like to start out by adding a new business section to the work session <br />agendas. <br />Printup commented that might be a good idea. <br />Loftus stated that would allow the Council and Staff to develop some parameters first before placing it on <br />the regular City Council agenda. <br />Walsh stated that would still limit his ability to make a motion during the mayor/council report and that it <br />would be limiting their ability to talk about subjects that might be important. <br />McMillan stated if the Council does this, she would like them all to agree that this is not going to become <br />a political wedge between the majority of the council and the minority in order to get votes on the record. <br />McMillan stated if they are going to bring up new ideas, that's fine, but that they should try not to drop a <br />bombshell and put people on the spot by requiring them to make a decision immediately. McMillan <br />stated she would like it to be a respectful process and that she wants to work as a team. <br />Loftus stated some of the items brought up do not rise to a priority level and that it would be important at <br />the goal setting meeting at the beginning of the year that the Council come to those decisions together. <br />Loftus stated those priorities give the Council a plan for the year and she hopes the Council continues <br />with that. <br />Printup stated discussing new business at the work session is a good start. <br />Walsh stated having it as a specific topic at a work session is fine but that he does not want to limit what <br />can be done at a City Council meeting. <br />McMillan stated it is how something is presented to fellow Council Members. McMillan noted she has <br />been in the minority in the past on the Council but the idea of using some type of vehicle in which to <br />force votes to create a record is not respectful of the process. <br />Page 25 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.