My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-2016 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
10-10-2016 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2016 3:22:20 PM
Creation date
11/18/2016 3:21:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 10, 2016 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT (continued) <br />McMillan stated she can understand the idea of giving the developer a chance to present their idea <br />without having a lot of interference from the neighborhood but that it is a big thing for the residents and <br />they would like to be heard. McMillan stated another option would be to erect a sign up along the road <br />saying sketch plan proposal. <br />McMillan stated she would like the City to take a look at that in November and what other cities are <br />doing. McMillan stated as more and more of these developments come up and the proposals are radically <br />different from what the property is zoned for, the City should perhaps have a more inclusive approach <br />right from the get -go. <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />13. AGENDA TOPICS OR REQUESTS <br />City Administrator Loftus stated she added this item on the agenda because it has come up as a concern or <br />a question from time to time as to how items get included on the City Council agenda. Loftus stated if the <br />Council is unsatisfied with how it is currently being handled, there are a few options to discuss, such as <br />adding a new business section or discussing how to use the mayor/council reports. <br />Loftus noted this is not really an action item for the Council but that Staff is looking for some direction on <br />how they would like to proceed. <br />Levang suggested discussing this item in a work session. Levang recommended Staff provide some <br />history and background on what happens in other cities and what Staff feels is best for their work load. <br />McMillan stated she is okay with adding a new business section toward the end of the agenda. <br />Printup commented that is not too unusual. <br />Levang stated she would like to see some parameters placed around that and that it is helpful to have a <br />Staff report on the item. <br />McMillan stated in the past under mayor/council report they attempted to try to get a consensus without a <br />formal vote. McMillan stated since they have been struggling with that, a new business section would be <br />a way to formalize it but that she would like to ensure it does not become any council member's special <br />project list. <br />Printup stated what he has struggled with is trying to get clear direction on how someone can raise a topic <br />for future discussion. Printup stated he is looking for a place to talk about something to give it that <br />starting point but that it does not necessarily need to be in the form of a motion. Printup stated it could be <br />a consensus to discuss it further in the near future and then everyone will know whether there is going to <br />be a discussion on it in the future. <br />McMillan stated some parameters on a new business section would help to keep it from becoming <br />political and also prevent someone from forcing a vote that same night or requiring Staff to change their <br />work load in order to deal with it right away. <br />Page 24 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.